From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C657C6E5CC for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jan 2016 05:19:12 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,358,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="870727247" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jan 2016 05:19:11 -0800 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1453984641-1849-1-git-send-email-maxin.john@intel.com> <20160128131355.GB1902@mbabyjoh-mobl.fi.intel.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <56AA148C.2050104@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 15:15:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libical: update to 2.0.0 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:19:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/28/2016 03:13 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > Presumably although the ABI changed, the API is the same so bluez5 and > so on still builds against libical 2? Generally, when there is a scary-looking major version update like this, it's a good idea to 'bitbake world'. Alex