From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BF473175 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 21:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2016 13:28:27 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,386,1449561600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="875505938" Received: from alimonb-mobl1.zpn.intel.com (HELO [10.219.5.31]) ([10.219.5.31]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2016 13:28:25 -0800 To: Paul Eggleton References: <35476879.65FcALFN4F@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <56B11E6A.6080005@linux.intel.com> <3922884.O19QKotbn0@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?QW7DrWJhbCBMaW3Ds24=?= Message-ID: <56B11FED.9000709@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:30:21 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3922884.O19QKotbn0@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, benjamin.esquivel@intel.com, =?UTF-8?B?QW7DrWJhbCBMaW3Ds24=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/20] classes/populate_sdk_ext: Add OE_SDK_EXT_SILENT env variable X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 21:28:30 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 77364 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mimAITvHtfr4NB00FSqGiVkt4V0XR750s" --mimAITvHtfr4NB00FSqGiVkt4V0XR750s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/02/2016 03:25 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 15:23:54 An=EDbal Lim=F3n wrote: >> Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> Rather than adding another variable for this why not just redirect th= e >>> output to /dev/null ? >> >> Because this is disabled when SDK tests (compatibility) ran using eSDK= >> so sometimes needs to SILENT it when automatic process is working >> another times don't like when user uses it. >=20 > At face value, redirection during automated testing and not when not so= lves=20 > this. >=20 We can't only redirect because is a python test that looks for some output in the sdtout, if we redirect to the /dev/null then lose the value= =2E >> In this case the SDK tests fails because it looks to stdout and found >> devtool msg. >=20 > Which test failed and why? Is this test [1], as i said is an SDK test running on eSDK env. [1] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/tree/meta/lib/oeqa= /sdk/python.py?h=3Dalimon/esdk_testsuite_export#n22 >=20 > Cheers, > Paul >=20 --mimAITvHtfr4NB00FSqGiVkt4V0XR750s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWsR/wAAoJEGJqcE9h3glgSNwP+wcxmS40LSvRUrQUQEwVVZi7 VnuyzQ5xj/9X7LNVLiLrY1rFYtkGX0H3ayTDafRn4l6EcxZIggS5YPHqDgy2jmxE Y101VbrgBFK+502/fD31ZKxs8kcNk0CIRFUxTvq5mQCWsTN57wNFrzRbq7P4GSW0 Y97h0mc7DeoH3BOvN9PJpoKiIP/s4v4crbNrrIPiRvoncj9eJybQEZ5fmu50MByL YVQZOq9KIjW231bb4Z311EZAVlDWskT+1rPB6jst8Rh7TDvkmRjozk3BFylh9HEU teTI9Mn1tDUaK/jZOXOkYum4N9i5ywvq/BPf3Emlqn0BHwW7OHmAV2HbvfyJ7rkx 40SBBG3kemdSh2jJWIfsE6agCBCqJImhI1XXQKAQIDuVKaoeTsYDSpJaSZe6EFqN CW02tP3t155IUj8PTmkoOLM02ESdZ45YQ1S1ir9aN4ByOILfzbU+hGYpuKwqnYil /HJYTN+6Ze2XDQEEyBfhEyUym9VaA6pEMRbU01EYk/kviQI8jr4aHAPFP+yfjdVN rAHJEakYMvcJQSxKA9GTPK+aPXnmGQih8ZoiPen787t1VNLPYahr1sIqIY3L04u2 BnDbZFoBiAvyyjCwbVCuWgQOAFgBWl4TinWe/m5x/djc8ZpBcnHuOOfbAlUTX0S8 daKjEMW6kLy1hjrZjgH0 =IvDP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mimAITvHtfr4NB00FSqGiVkt4V0XR750s--