From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765BF75E2D for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id u1M8fF7i027398 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:41:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.231] (128.224.162.231) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:41:15 -0800 To: "Burton, Ross" References:

<56C407CB.4060100@windriver.com> From: Kang Kai Message-ID: <56CAC9A9.7070906@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:41:13 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] useradd_base.bbclass: fix simultaneous with flock X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:41:16 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050603080901040509080001" --------------050603080901040509080001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2016年02月18日 07:49, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 17 February 2016 at 05:40, Kang Kai > wrote: > > I prefer to keep such check. There is more than one case that > causes operation error such as pass wrong parameters. The messages > are helpful for developers. > > > In that case the groupadd will return an error code. What situations > with proper locking will result in groupadd running successfully but > the group not being added? Sorry for late reply. I think I understand your meanings. V3 will be sent. --Kai > > Ross -- Regards, Neil | Kai Kang --------------050603080901040509080001 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 2016年02月18日 07:49, Burton, Ross wrote:

On 17 February 2016 at 05:40, Kang Kai <Kai.Kang@windriver.com> wrote:

I prefer to keep such check. There is more than one case that causes operation error such as pass wrong parameters. The messages are helpful for developers.

In that case the groupadd will return an error code. What situations with proper locking will result in groupadd running successfully but the group not being added?

Sorry for late reply.

I think I understand your meanings. V3 will be sent.

--Kai

Ross

-- 
Regards,
Neil | Kai Kang

--------------050603080901040509080001--