From: "Aníbal Limón" <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
To: Randy Witt <randy.e.witt@linux.intel.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com, "Aníbal Limón" <limon.anibal@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] oeqa/sdkext: Add sdk_update.SDKUpdateTest class.
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:26:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CB36C3.2080609@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CB34E8.6060203@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3271 bytes --]
On 02/22/2016 10:18 AM, Randy Witt wrote:
> On 02/22/2016 07:03 AM, Aníbal Limón wrote:
>> From: Aníbal Limón <limon.anibal@gmail.com>
>>
>> The SDKUpdateTest class test devtool sdk-update mechanism inside
>> eSDK.
>>
>> The SDKUpdateTest class search for new sdk if not found uses
>> the main one then it publish the eSDK into known folder
>> inside work and it starts a web server for serve the eSDK.
>>
>> Finally it executes sdk-update over http, the local test is
>> commented due to bug [1].
>>
>> [1] https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9043
>>
>> [YOCTO #9089]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <limon.anibal@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/sdk_update.py | 39
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/sdk_update.py
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/sdk_update.py
>> b/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/sdk_update.py
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..16f5b10
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/sdk_update.py
>> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
>> +import os
>> +import shutil
>> +import subprocess
>> +
>> +from oeqa.oetest import oeSDKExtTest
>> +from oeqa.utils.httpserver import HTTPService
>> +
>> +class SdkUpdateTest(oeSDKExtTest):
>> +
>> + @classmethod
>> + def setUpClass(self):
>> + self.publish_dir = os.path.join(self.tc.sdktestdir,
>> 'esdk_publish')
>> + if os.path.exists(self.publish_dir):
>> + shutil.rmtree(self.publish_dir)
>> + os.mkdir(self.publish_dir)
>> +
>> + tcname_new = self.tc.d.expand(
>> + "${SDK_DEPLOY}/${TOOLCHAINEXT_OUTPUTNAME}-new.sh")
>> + if not os.path.exists(tcname_new):
>> + tcname_new = self.tc.tcname
>> +
>> + cmd = 'oe-publish-sdk %s %s' % (tcname_new, self.publish_dir)
>> + subprocess.check_output(cmd, shell=True)
>> +
>> + self.http_service = HTTPService(self.publish_dir)
>> + self.http_service.start()
>
> I think Paul and I briefly mentioned it, but SimpleHTTPServer fails as
> an sstate mirror if enough fetchers run. We think it was because of a
> limit on the number of simultaneous connections. So I would expect this
> to fail for instance if all packages were updated.
I tested running an update and didn't fail this implementation of
oeqa.utils open another process with multiprocessing for serve http only.
>
> But really we shouldn't care too much about the sstate updating part,
> and more about the layer updating etc. Ideally this test would check to
> make sure the local sdk now matches the remote.
I could add a test for the output that i saw displays "Already updated"
or what you mean about match?
>
>> + self.http_url = "http://127.0.0.1:%d" % self.http_service.port
>> +
>> + def test_sdk_update_http(self):
>> + output = self._run("devtool sdk-update \"%s\"" % self.http_url)
>> +
>> +# def test_sdk_update_local(self):
>> +# output = self._run("devtool sdk-update \"%s\"" %
>> self.publish_dir)
>> +
>> + @classmethod
>> + def tearDownClass(self):
>> + self.http_service.stop()
>> + shutil.rmtree(self.publish_dir)
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-22 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-22 15:03 [PATCH 0/4] Add extensible SDK update test Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] classes/testsdk: Move code for avoid PATHs to oeqa.utils Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] classes/testsdk: Move the removal of bitbake PATH to eSDK context only Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 15:54 ` Randy Witt
2016-02-22 16:09 ` Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 16:23 ` Randy Witt
2016-02-22 16:37 ` Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 16:48 ` Burton, Ross
2016-02-22 17:05 ` Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 17:27 ` Randy Witt
2016-02-22 17:47 ` Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 18:04 ` Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 15:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] classes/testsdk: Pass tcname to SDK and SDKExt contexts Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 15:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] oeqa/sdkext: Add sdk_update.SDKUpdateTest class Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 16:18 ` Randy Witt
2016-02-22 16:26 ` Aníbal Limón [this message]
2016-02-22 16:36 ` Randy Witt
2016-02-22 17:10 ` Aníbal Limón
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56CB36C3.2080609@linux.intel.com \
--to=anibal.limon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=limon.anibal@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=randy.e.witt@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox