From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFCC60119 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 21:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id u29LNjTS001949 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:23:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from soho-mhatle-m.local (172.25.36.226) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:23:44 -0800 To: References: <1457547560-21542-1-git-send-email-ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems Message-ID: <56E09460.9070105@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 15:23:44 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PATCH] package-deb: Ignore circular dependencies X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 21:23:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 3/9/16 2:33 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 9 March 2016 at 18:19, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado > wrote: > > + bb.warn("Package %s rdepends on itself. Ignoring > this dependency" % pkg) > > > Depending on yourself seems wrong no matter what packaging backend you're using, > even if it isn't fatal. Maybe this should be added to the general sanity checks > in insane.bbclass? > > Ross > > I disagree.. it's quite common for an automatic dependency to trigger a dependency on one's self. I.e.: python provides /usr/bin/python python includes a script that uses /usr/bin/python depends system now has a provide and dependency for /usr/bin/python in the same package. This is 'fine'. Since opkg/deb can't handle file based dependencies, it would be reasonable for a dependency on /usr/bin/python to be translated to 'python'. And now you have the python package depending on the python package. If the package manager interface does not support this, then it should be the package manager .bbclass that should filter out these items. This is what we've had to do in the rpm backend... I think it's reasonable for the deb and opkg backends as well. --Mark