From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E125E6FFE2 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 09:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id u2J99UCi029325 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 19 Mar 2016 02:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.159] (128.224.162.159) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 02:09:29 -0700 To: "Burton, Ross" References: From: Hongxu Jia Message-ID: <56ED1745.2070306@windriver.com> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:09:25 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] gconf: fix buildpaths QA issue X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 09:09:34 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020504060005070109080409" --------------020504060005070109080409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/19/2016 12:28 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 18 March 2016 at 09:01, Hongxu Jia > wrote: > > In ${S}/gconf/gconfd.c, we have: > ... > /* -- Debug only */ > > if (addresses == NULL) > { > gconf_log(GCL_DEBUG, _("gconfd compiled with debugging; > trying to load gconf.path from the source directory")); > conffile = g_strconcat(GCONF_SRCDIR, "/gconf/gconf.path", NULL); > addresses = gconf_load_source_path(conffile, NULL); > g_free(conffile); > } > > /* -- End of Debug Only */ > > > This seems like a lot of effort to remove a build path from the > binaries. Can we just disable the debugging support instead? GConf > is effectively unmaintained these days anyway. > Of course yes, I will update it to disable debug support //Hongxu > Ross --------------020504060005070109080409 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 03/19/2016 12:28 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:

On 18 March 2016 at 09:01, Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com> wrote:
In ${S}/gconf/gconfd.c, we have:
...
  /* -- Debug only */

  if (addresses == NULL)
    {
      gconf_log(GCL_DEBUG, _("gconfd compiled with debugging; trying to load gconf.path from the source directory"));
      conffile = g_strconcat(GCONF_SRCDIR, "/gconf/gconf.path", NULL);
      addresses = gconf_load_source_path(conffile, NULL);
      g_free(conffile);
    }

  /* -- End of Debug Only */

This seems like a lot of effort to remove a build path from the binaries.  Can we just disable the debugging support instead?  GConf is effectively unmaintained these days anyway.


Of course yes, I will update it to disable debug support

//Hongxu

Ross

--------------020504060005070109080409--