From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com (mail-yw0-f176.google.com [209.85.161.176]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5742160248; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f176.google.com with SMTP id h65so37459175ywe.0; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:11:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BAazTvV0Vr0cFIWVXWdbseyelgAr+Ga6SmygmMixJPA=; b=HjqQ6x7GngSGwYcYltLX0bv4D7AvQ8IdV8OHyy016gklyj0ge4+Dv1BsPW/ibHt62B tPEa+wm2Z4ysfV84lvrZAsZw++cLb+KxvF3SGRkxPftb7KDJTmzhNVMLfyYjjKMx4Jlk cG5UGugW3M0bSyDshmZMNS9imHo+MyYgvrrDBAFxueoJx1bc8vvCZxTqWJFhAbMj6FgB fB0dWnar/4//kKHuE16Wb8AmkOfioL01qNI+rl04cTUpoTunwIiC7VSeZ3yOl5tRsKJO 6KwX1oiTOuX4M0+bYL962j0M1slEIKmILwgj+8DZEsdDiRlX3fjlU9yOVANusFDAmlOk THZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BAazTvV0Vr0cFIWVXWdbseyelgAr+Ga6SmygmMixJPA=; b=HGKohyHGiLStFIZggq3QBTWxrkddo1dyLmqA6PF4HYY8/e8WVj+lfI9Ns7wO6MQ/ku NChiX471efNZ7wo2voslNQvd5awaCQSPCXlp7uZBbwsupuJUJD3xuXkXchckICFuC/sj wIQiorZ66H4iH2joGLzRCPwqG1QAq930Z06JON9H1MQm7dgGW+7qxprptsoXKEIzVMlL ToQS+AGxEbjJe8W7ArkYGaAUg+bZw5xM0ydByYxNI+GIrQgVTy/UOk8mntpALoyF6LJA yn61122wGJl6KfLfs4QV1RIckSrEhebKWlYDiQebEUPxYfkDG/BDTGV6h+3Gsfj/TVTf sX9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIsznKWRPoHqx2CVwWJf9ChPzyeZSNXYwAh/ItZzIiSm2WdcG3RkRUzklBGx2P/KQ== X-Received: by 10.13.216.76 with SMTP id a73mr2614068ywe.179.1458771109498; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.43.100.29] ([64.2.3.194]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a202sm2684819ywe.22.2016.03.23.15.11.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:11:48 -0700 (PDT) To: Jeff Osier-Mixon , Philip Balister References: <56DEF97F.9070306@balister.org> <56F2C618.3050205@gmail.com> <20160323210850.GA5376@linux-yxv0> <1458767514382.89578@seescan.com> <56F30D13.6030909@balister.org> From: akuster808 Message-ID: <56F314A2.70100@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:11:46 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Yocto Project , "openembedded-members@lists.openembedded.org" , openembedded-core , "openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org" , Fred Ollinger Subject: Re: [yocto] [oe] OEDAM, April 8 in San Diego after ELC X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:11:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/23/2016 03:03 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: >>>> There are only 10 people signed up. >>>> Is that enough people to justify the expense room or even meet? >>> >>> I have no idea what the budget might be or what a room might cost. I'll leave >>> it to those who do know to worry about the costs versus the benefits. > > I would give an unequivocal "yes" to this (as the guy with the credit > card). We need reliable internet access to loop in those who can't be > there in person, plus this was actually a reasonable rate for the > immediate area. tijuana? OEDMX We can take up to 25 and these meetings usually gain 5 > or 6 people who never sign up on the wiki, so I think we are in > excellent shape. >