Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cliff Brake <cliff.brake@gmail.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: How to use externalsrc with git workspace
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 15:58:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F98CDF.7080205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458978069.3073.62.camel@linuxfoundation.org>

On 03/26/2016 03:41 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> HEAD is a revision, not a branch and the fetcher became a bit more
> picky about that difference. Your local tree must have HEAD on some
> branch which would usually be master so setting branch=master is likely
> correct, or don't set that parameter at all? master isn't just a remote
> thing.
>
> The piece which says "use the HEAD revision" is the SRCREV =
> "${AUTOREV}" line.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
We typically set up our projects to use git submodules, such that the top level
calls out a set of submodules which are the actively developed applications and
other bits in the system.  These submodules are externalsrc trees for bitbake,
and include a bitbake recipe (bitbake recipe is embedded directly in source
code).  Sometimes these submodules/externalsrc trees track branches (typically
release-xyz, or develop-xyz), but almost never master.  Sometimes they may be at
a tagged version that is not at the HEAD of a branch.  In the end, I want to be
able to build exactly what is in the externalsrc directory, and accurately
include the git version in the PV.  Branches/tags may change at any time and I
don't want to have to edit the recipe every time this happens.

Repo might be used in a similar fashion to manage a tree of components that get
built.  What we are trying to avoid is having to edit the git version in the
recipes to lock down versions for a set of components for a build -- git
submodules or repo work much better for doing this.

I tried nobranch=1;rev=HEAD, but then that conflicts with ${AUTOREV}.

The git fetcher could have an option like head=1 in the SRC_URI, that told it to
use whatever is in the git workspace, and allow AUTOREV to figure out version. 

Perhaps a better approach might be to figure out a function for PV that simply
extracts the git version of ${S} -- that is really all I want.  In this case, I
might even need a SRC_URI, as I'm not really fetching anything -- its already there.

Thanks,
Cliff


  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-28 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-25 20:18 How to use externalsrc with git workspace Cliff Brake
2016-03-25 21:07 ` Cliff Brake
2016-03-26  7:41 ` Richard Purdie
2016-03-28 19:58   ` Cliff Brake [this message]
2016-03-28 22:28     ` Richard Purdie
2016-03-29 12:25       ` Cliff Brake
2016-03-29 12:28         ` Richard Purdie
2016-03-29 13:50           ` Cliff Brake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56F98CDF.7080205@gmail.com \
    --to=cliff.brake@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox