From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com [209.85.220.47]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E7960722 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id zm5so20735200pac.0 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:52:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0rJEPNwAmeuUz7tbXqbp3wGiWEdH/TCNB06arZqRVQU=; b=oXE2UIMmmFMqGXAvWFO2xbVqHfC4QlkcCqqpNQIcoJ5bTWEA8YydPzTIIJo9seJI97 G9x3Rgqje9/hLvONmr841/1V/JO4hJdRuBcaLS9WBP3WKCpd7gJYXuLrQAMC3IwZll8E 0DgYZ7ZX91XeiAhKQT3603Mr+OGCOnzBjTGavg2pqx5CTw1LXdhj46c6zy34qCS43g3B WahPRgGjFZsgzV0POiUZsct/qNqnvAfx7RpQmW5Nwaoa+10yEm5ZawY/pxyVvLqzmdY2 61qVL2rUn4FFJNkHrMfXgY/58NPcEobpfLr6Jjo5kKSBlswLBw4TbY3T2PZ8VK+PuJ7p 27OA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0rJEPNwAmeuUz7tbXqbp3wGiWEdH/TCNB06arZqRVQU=; b=JNR8kH58hhLdNBxnklhvmRm1bVA+TKvJpOS/sW8EFT+7eBAFK6yJ9pSjJaNUTvaQR8 QMmKBM9ITkdpvpzJJ8q0CBdPl+YrF0+R2VnTpLmkAOVj70YcDKbbLxRZYkLn8GOLh9H/ KNKB7iGMdSfvEAuOjQaGh+Q+k4rmDhsc+tzVxqLE8qA/FlqISusbUPCVZs0m/yQ3JumP QjbqCE46+HFgonXhZvG7GByUKPA9HahL1keRY5EAxmQ03HtDUNgOuXnO97Qz1pQbslc3 0Qab+v1MkoxUtogByBCIuqpkioKIpWi4KW/z66wIIn5bbRwJ0uSdIV0tuJBZP+fYzpg2 OmDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLbBADu1iJcHM7R4FpMMjf4M5MIwoqQdEBqzLIvuNXTd+k2A2s8qNnkZaWKnQRkuQ== X-Received: by 10.66.190.40 with SMTP id gn8mr45712696pac.64.1459198365324; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:202:4000:1239:714a:4e59:1cde:8924? ([2601:202:4000:1239:714a:4e59:1cde:8924]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i9sm37726428pfi.95.2016.03.28.13.52.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:52:44 -0700 (PDT) To: Otavio Salvador References: <56F952F7.2010409@gmail.com> From: akuster808 Message-ID: <56F99996.9010803@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:52:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: Aarch64 u-boot with gcc .5x X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:52:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/28/2016 11:20 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Armin, > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:51 PM, akuster808 wrote: >> I have an arm64 odroid c2 board. If I build u-boot with the current OE >> 5.3 gcc it hangs at kernel load time. If I use 4.9 gcc it works fine. A >> 5.3 built kernel boots fine with a 4.9 built u-boot. >> >> The vendor supplied u-boot is hacked up and am leaning it that direction >> as the culprit so I am looking for data points. >> >> Is anyone using a current u-boot with 5.3 gcc on an arm64 machine? if >> so, any special tweaks to get that combo to work? > > I am using one ARM 64 SoC with GCC 5.2 at this moment and it works > fine. What U-Boot version is the fork based on? 2015.01 - armin >