From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (mail-pa0-f44.google.com [209.85.220.44]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A728A6011B for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id zm5so21939937pac.0 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 15:08:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2D1S6jDBEW9GBi1hf2oKYeEdfsk9XkXxpc50QprpWSA=; b=fwPvcnUZa5y4/d3gW8mnfl8+THUQ2mksgVk1TSzszVHQGODoSTjUBKbQyj2YqlVWrc RKru+eWC20yxGFXTH1rj+5XNHdok11IzKlRIeyZdkXkCDuhafC/UtUEFQJZegj7AYbi3 qeftS/yd5BPMK5f+pytaZw4W0lrtgTgtiqmja8TwbyEVoa1B1U5ff3a0sxxtRHVr7xoy U3Nd9MR51PqSmuS0tnrdzu5VAlL+ycQD3IhIEVp1iC1KLIZNlJ8aevqO7mzj0DjjHKDz Xj2TvaeqD90rxCfNSS/YVUh66tD1MqXh3lWliLjtH8JM1yNSSo0aMlqBgYg1fW9EtZEj EWOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2D1S6jDBEW9GBi1hf2oKYeEdfsk9XkXxpc50QprpWSA=; b=mQI4dIx0+YRwV97D5k/UJdKjw0kFKbe/PQ8gjDF0P5BDx6yh/4rdrofcjvEuD9fR5s YiENxufeQNO2g+gSF97yW6W7WRhrSjiqN5t42usOM1gJxN9BImsTVQg1CePXhbKv3tLQ avlMv9wQmlqV0mksf3V7ii9nyLD3ePkk7+7ysO/aSVVf2iQjHCOk3m38AkrRd4akInS6 eulQ/UVj9PuFBCZzOumCu5HMLZaiezZAK7X08xSad4ny7o5Y2WRPRSaQi/jgxjZleSRh cb/pTpb4GWUs1J+1Z11j1Ji9nWphQHLISgBgO3NV1SnD+5OG2cPxTAhJbL1I1s+Wo7mv CSBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJUc/OrwRkteNo82w8T+U3euE7LoTyIt0GlvpI8r3ndkP9+dnNMsIv7Z6184kcSbg== X-Received: by 10.66.140.39 with SMTP id rd7mr46342050pab.92.1459202908876; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:202:4000:1239:714a:4e59:1cde:8924? ([2601:202:4000:1239:714a:4e59:1cde:8924]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id fn3sm38013603pab.20.2016.03.28.15.08.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 15:08:27 -0700 (PDT) To: Otavio Salvador References: <56F952F7.2010409@gmail.com> <56F99996.9010803@gmail.com> From: akuster808 Message-ID: <56F9AB56.2010707@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 15:08:22 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: Aarch64 u-boot with gcc .5x X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:08:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/28/2016 02:17 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 5:52 PM, akuster808 wrote: >> On 03/28/2016 11:20 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:51 PM, akuster808 wrote: >>>> I have an arm64 odroid c2 board. If I build u-boot with the current OE >>>> 5.3 gcc it hangs at kernel load time. If I use 4.9 gcc it works fine. A >>>> 5.3 built kernel boots fine with a 4.9 built u-boot. >>>> >>>> The vendor supplied u-boot is hacked up and am leaning it that direction >>>> as the culprit so I am looking for data points. >>>> >>>> Is anyone using a current u-boot with 5.3 gcc on an arm64 machine? if >>>> so, any special tweaks to get that combo to work? >>> >>> I am using one ARM 64 SoC with GCC 5.2 at this moment and it works >>> fine. What U-Boot version is the fork based on? >> >> 2015.01 > > Please try to use GCC 5.2 and see if it makes any difference. The BSP > I am referring to is currently using it and it is working fine. > > The forked version is the same. Of course, it may have changes which > hides or solve the issue but it is a hint anyway. ok. will try this next. kind regards, Armin