From: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>
To: Alexander Kanevskiy <kad@kad.name>,
Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Cc: Joshua Lock <joshua.lock@collabora.co.uk>,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] wic/utils/partitionedfs.py: assemble .wic images as sparse files
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 09:41:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <570930BD.6070203@balister.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANFkWp=ynO2J38+k=mBH6Y3GFOb2kZhbM9zea2T09EL2BDZHxA@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/09/2016 03:36 AM, Alexander Kanevskiy wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
>> From: Joshua Lock <joshua.lock@collabora.co.uk>
>>
>> The individual partitions created by wic are sparse but without
>> this change the assembled image is written as one (potentially
>> very) large file.
>>
>> Preserve sparseness in the assembled image by passing the sparse
>> conversion symbol.
>>
>> [YOCTO #9099]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.lock@collabora.co.uk>
>> ---
>> scripts/lib/wic/utils/partitionedfs.py | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/lib/wic/utils/partitionedfs.py
>> b/scripts/lib/wic/utils/partitionedfs.py
>> index 5a103bb..3e2b420 100644
>> --- a/scripts/lib/wic/utils/partitionedfs.py
>> +++ b/scripts/lib/wic/utils/partitionedfs.py
>> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ class Image(object):
>> source = part['source_file']
>> if source:
>> # install source_file contents into a partition
>> - cmd = "dd if=%s of=%s bs=%d seek=%d count=%d
>> conv=notrunc" % \
>> + cmd = "dd if=%s of=%s bs=%d seek=%d count=%d
>> conv=notrunc,sparse" % \
>> (source, image_file, self.sector_size,
>> part['start'], part['size'])
>> exec_cmd(cmd)
>>
>
>
>
> This might be dangerous. Even in recent version of DD (coreutils 8.25), it
> might not detect in source file mapped/unmapped blocks properly,
> (just use is_nul() function to check if block contains only zeros, instead
> of e.g. fiemap).
> Result might be so, that in output file block which must be zeros is
> actually become unmapped. And as consequence, if it might not be written to
> destination drive.
Does it work with bmaptool?
Philip
>
> Let me show example based on Ostro Project sparse images:
>
> kad@orava:/tmp> ls -ls 2222
> 308416 -rw-r--r-- 1 kad users 5280628736 Apr 6 00:53 2222
> kad@orava:/tmp> grep /MappedBlocksCount 2222.bmap
> <MappedBlocksCount> 77104 </MappedBlocksCount>
>
> Now, let's copy it with dd:
> kad@orava:/tmp> ~/cu/coreutils-8.25/src/dd if=2222 of=4444
> conv=notrunc,sparse bs=4096
> 1289216+0 records in
> 1289216+0 records out
> 5280628736 bytes (5.3 GB, 4.9 GiB) copied, 1.31239 s, 4.0 GB/s
> kad@orava:/tmp> bmaptool create 4444 -o 4444.bmap
> kad@orava:/tmp> ls -ls 4444
> 308348 -rw-r--r-- 1 kad users 5280628736 Apr 9 13:22 4444
> kad@orava:/tmp> grep /MappedBlocksCount 4444.bmap
> <MappedBlocksCount> 77087 </MappedBlocksCount>
> kad@orava:/tmp>
>
> As you can see, in result of dd copied file we have less blocks mapped than
> in original.
>
> Diffing block ranges: (- original file, + dd copied)
> <BlockMap>
> - <Range> 0-4 </Range>
> - <Range> 768-3321 </Range>
> - <Range> 4608-7161 </Range>
> + <Range> 0 </Range>
> + <Range> 768-770 </Range>
> + <Range> 772-774 </Range>
> + <Range> 776 </Range>
> + <Range> 780-3321 </Range>
> + <Range> 4608-4610 </Range>
> + <Range> 4612-4614 </Range>
> + <Range> 4616 </Range>
> + <Range> 4620-7161 </Range>
> - <Range> 1289211-1289215 </Range>
> + <Range> 1289211 </Range>
> + <Range> 1289215 </Range>
> </BlockMap>
>
> As you can see, some blocks that must be cleaned (e.g. 1-3 around MBR or in
> the end, 1289211-1289215 where GPT bits located) are not marked as mapped,
> thus in case of sparse aware writing tool used to write to destination
> drive it might result as unwritten zero blocks, thus some old data would
> left on device.
>
> I would suggest not to accept this patch right now, and do copy function
> that would be aware about real mapped/unmapped blocks.
> Something similar that I've did for Ostro Project here:
> https://github.com/ostroproject/meta-ostro/commit/d883169c3266c3c44f22db5f75ae94c4cf0f2924
>
> but adopted to be generic for use inside wic.
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-09 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-08 9:14 [PATCH 1/2] wic/utils/partitionedfs.py: assemble .wic images as sparse files Joshua Lock
2016-04-08 9:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] oeqa/selftest/wic: add test case for sparse images Joshua Lock
2016-04-09 10:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] wic/utils/partitionedfs.py: assemble .wic images as sparse files Alexander Kanevskiy
2016-04-09 16:41 ` Philip Balister [this message]
2016-04-11 11:52 ` Alexander Kanevskiy
2016-04-12 11:55 ` Burton, Ross
2016-04-10 14:34 ` Robert Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=570930BD.6070203@balister.org \
--to=philip@balister.org \
--cc=joshua.g.lock@intel.com \
--cc=joshua.lock@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=kad@kad.name \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox