From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEED601F6 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id l6so13815758wml.3 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 06:36:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=koumoul.net; s=dkim; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:organization:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B4SnqObRh61IdtDWTWZwFQfppa7+ZcFEIYUx2U6bGeQ=; b=bQzpyyQ0BvewpKavnMoja9KaKLLLsqf+Scay+6WDwqPJCKToYimyRR+U6nifYOMQNx X7RoivlGbK7Jtnf7HV5zUVoKxt2NQbKxEin42ErZUkFiGq26ekXlEFN0qa1u61inU/Yq HE6jES39NL8X6fDJUM/j34JcpIZGXo/xUbsFc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iot-bzh.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:organization:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B4SnqObRh61IdtDWTWZwFQfppa7+ZcFEIYUx2U6bGeQ=; b=DssUWbsvod0IzQOU1xx+/cwPJepCk8VBTLikDfC/wf2MrTY0aEWUyb+G4FwZ0weqXZ DnUb0a3YDs+JlNQaWY3x014X+k0gTNvJstmjAi/lXLAynuzjFqmxiFD0yOoPMc7DYSCW 84fow3iW4rMBPO4U35SazrNeH9zR2CU4e8RDoeRP0U8n3BLpil04Gy0dz2duAa3h01jW 3GpVI9Pydyf/Yr1khnpnuXkv85vPEuaAfmcqC7yx6wJfp9+RbXavCSHtQaUmzVKho8RR 0DBMWQZ5vZfuMg1K5VWJ5Qgieq3odznhpU32q3RsGYdbpBSXsu9SStr0jPMvM8SzuP6Q Nbcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from :organization:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B4SnqObRh61IdtDWTWZwFQfppa7+ZcFEIYUx2U6bGeQ=; b=TjF0SiYEgDjJjuRtYPELloomT6rZdHkJiQODiEL3l+asF+lcHpJpLvT2rPTM7Am0Mq YwOiC8R2FihAguTIRPyjJtuBMGeywN95kuRsJoGACELuUkGQKnbcEgpt9AufcLDKHkYz Q7JExvvMppWdCq8jzBm1a96R7f3CTWDBEVVRZCXnrfuPhdOmSpxHCoBQKqUU1aiw0p5Q 99pYyO7rsD/C+HIKZKMaORpJd6Gsjc6oUxO04qUjAdMU0Gmczpd+b/AXxU19QbXhW/hO UX+2Lu+sxSgZA3h+4AESb0NyhSsSQDmUkfWnbzS7sq+nXZJ01BffcbGqkxOoRH47JvTC 0P1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWC0dtcS4ZtQX6Puc+iogKRlgqqaCaHEmgmHXYPNL1aj6l0Y7j7LgBRfiVJCf7dNg== X-Received: by 10.28.53.193 with SMTP id c184mr12904227wma.93.1461159400049; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 06:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.105.60] (pat35-3-82-245-140-164.fbx.proxad.net. [82.245.140.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s10sm5726076wjp.3.2016.04.20.06.36.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Apr 2016 06:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: "Yannick Gicquel [ IoT.bzh ]" Reply-To: yannick.gicquel@iot.bzh References: <1461070003-12494-1-git-send-email-yannick.gicquel@iot.bzh> <1461070003-12494-2-git-send-email-yannick.gicquel@iot.bzh> <571640FF.4040000@opendreambox.org> <57173D88.5040102@iot.bzh> <20160420083737.GD3520@ad.chargestorm.se> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, anders@chargestorm.se From: Yannick GICQUEL Organization: IOT.bzh Message-ID: <571785ED.9020407@iot.bzh> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:36:45 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160420083737.GD3520@ad.chargestorm.se> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] u-boot: basic support of device tree blob reassembly X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:36:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 20/04/2016 10:37, Anders Darander a écrit : > Just a comment on task ordering. Not sure that it really matters > though... > > * Yannick GICQUEL [160420 10:28]: >> Le 19/04/2016 16:30, Andreas Oberritter a écrit : >>> Hello Yannick, >> Hi Andreas, >>> On 19.04.2016 14:46, Yannick Gicquel wrote: >>>> +addtask assemble_dtb after do_deploy before do_install >>> The task do_deploy executes after do_install. Does it really work this >>> way? I think bitbake should try to detect this and error out. >> I confirm do_deploy is executed before do_install. >> It looks like it is schedule this way by the last line of the file: >> addtask deploy before do_build after do_compile > Well, if task do_deploy is scheduled before do_install, that's just by > luck. > > The following line adds do_install: > > addtask install after do_compile > > Thus, the ordering between do_install and do_deploy isn't fixed. It > could be random, it could be based on alphabetical sorting, or the order > the tasks are added. However, it could easily change... Thanks for the precision. I understand that ordering is not fixed as both tasks depends on do_compile. I am on the way to send a v2 and the tasks are now sequenced as below : u-boot:do_deploy -> virtual/kernel:do_assemble_fitimage -> u-boot:do_install Best regards, > > Cheers, > Anders > >> (I attached the log.task_order for reference - FYI, behavior is the same on >> jethro or today's master branch)