From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dream-property.net (mail.dream-property.net [82.149.226.172]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CA060116 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:11:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2523141F4E; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:11:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.dream-property.net Received: from mail.dream-property.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.dream-property.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qBT7FHhPhxtu; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:10:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.22.22.61] (55d441eb.access.ecotel.net [85.212.65.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C450B3141DDA; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:10:57 +0200 (CEST) To: yannick.gicquel@iot.bzh, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1461070003-12494-1-git-send-email-yannick.gicquel@iot.bzh> <1461070003-12494-2-git-send-email-yannick.gicquel@iot.bzh> <571640FF.4040000@opendreambox.org> <57173D88.5040102@iot.bzh> From: Andreas Oberritter Message-ID: <57188B11.6080106@opendreambox.org> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:10:57 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57173D88.5040102@iot.bzh> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] u-boot: basic support of device tree blob reassembly X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:11:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 20.04.2016 10:27, Yannick GICQUEL wrote: > Le 19/04/2016 16:30, Andreas Oberritter a écrit : >> On 19.04.2016 14:46, Yannick Gicquel wrote: [...] >>> +addtask assemble_dtb after do_deploy before do_install >> The task do_deploy executes after do_install. Does it really work this >> way? I think bitbake should try to detect this and error out. > I confirm do_deploy is executed before do_install. > It looks like it is schedule this way by the last line of the file: > > addtask deploy before do_build after do_compile > > (I attached the log.task_order for reference - FYI, behavior is the same on > jethro or today's master branch) You're right, Yannick. I should have looked at u-boot.inc, instead of assuming the behaviour of kernel.bbclass was generic. Regards, Andreas