From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f66.google.com (mail-pa0-f66.google.com [209.85.220.66]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A0E6018C for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 20:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f66.google.com with SMTP id zy2so10899338pac.2 for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 13:59:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J8CZl1k3yrcYUkXZLO+CK3kqjvhJtwODlu2Jj9rr/J0=; b=HICT9Oe2cEFvM6KaNtqPuoMZ1WPBuG28S3b0a8bbmh2ZxrMc4diPGiE1XPstEZRdQf WP8WJ5Phoj8ftQv4By29yymGfmlEvL0Fw5DT2Jeg4T0KjC4FphS8B8YVoWn3T+M+gGHg pPzf5Op7DHZMF6qxMXH10zs9X23Zf79MawDkosYzo1OADNZ5XjEpAvhm0J8YUaC9RjQj 7ZNr0cSK6ewHVl9qR7BA365AYB21DSEBuk80Os7pmxNySfGLGjdVISy9AHf7Psg732rP T/ZTsgy7Sqp5/XmLzGWvcjeh4opxgPNZDeT+67y8i8YVuHt5tHuyTvKwArsNBDGfJGeg 0uYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J8CZl1k3yrcYUkXZLO+CK3kqjvhJtwODlu2Jj9rr/J0=; b=dyHlAcQxP3nGJ/hkzkAEZzkc/rP29eaI3dbQgS3JZ/T2yOMRoGuVs+eTRxA6wFCvP+ i8T1+Qiai0U/OnPOYez6SyyzuGjQC6T5j/hxgOk88V27gKzQdXAC6TQyClFV9Kw4G+JN t0LMwd76gILzBqElgK7KphkcdOaLbAKRSKvvmBoHsGUNaLhd61weLVa4JanI8VndGMoc Kuzjc+mvyY7dBdtQGjDKfxpZSvsfZ4vEDl1K0pnF4b11sVkCufzMRbkaUs7U0XLXRD3/ uQfjaq7odj2qMpGDBQF/akFDgqKHtRFiITiDqdWpcCUmcbGLdf5ZZK1QiTAcjB/aF3wL zQhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVD5Q1Q4/Crr4lSYcNWmH3sBFSGQT9PGMaRgd9N0Ri6dBNjM1k2Gdhi96BmiAqnlA== X-Received: by 10.66.151.104 with SMTP id up8mr24699125pab.134.1463173164909; Fri, 13 May 2016 13:59:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:202:4000:1239:c53a:7e08:2482:8461? ([2601:202:4000:1239:c53a:7e08:2482:8461]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u127sm29477465pfb.82.2016.05.13.13.59.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 13 May 2016 13:59:23 -0700 (PDT) To: Richard Purdie , Martin Jansa , Joshua Lock , Robert Yang References: <20160512141645.GA2567@jama> <1463157281.9746.114.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: akuster808 Message-ID: <5736402A.4030107@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 13:59:22 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1463157281.9746.114.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [fido][PATCH 0/1] Undo ABI breakage in OpenSSL X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 20:59:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/13/2016 09:34 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 16:16 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 01:06:33PM +0100, Joshua Lock wrote: >>> The backported upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.2h introduced a newer version >>> of >>> Debian's linker version-script which breaks the OpenSSL ABI. >>> This isn't desirable for a stable release, thus the attached patch >>> reverts >>> the linker-version changes and simply adds the 2 new symbols >>> required by >>> 1.0.2h. >>> >>> Thanks to Martin Jansa for spotting the issue and suggesting a fix. >> >> Thanks for following it and getting it merged so quickly. >> >> It was already merged in fido, can we get the same to jethro (which >> was >> also recently upgraded to 1.0.2h)? > > I'm hoping someone will give me a patch series which does this > correctly for jethro. Its why I haven't taken the previous pull > request. I will spin one - armin > > Cheers, > > Richard > > >