From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f68.google.com (mail-pa0-f68.google.com [209.85.220.68]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E96E731D5 for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 23:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f68.google.com with SMTP id gh9so9520967pac.0 for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 16:50:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G8g24xGQrfijo/+Y5Kp0ABZN80suXVdPWGdIWsCN9C8=; b=Q7vbOpEo9B437BXWAd3GNWCphouYPvUZMbzOWrctV3kcXBzdBv1wwVRtJvqD/JqWhS sS6g571X3ZIrgjLIK348ZxYqJd3LkIFufhY9UcUrOcw3R5OGHR/Ydvw6loz7MS+Zp+g7 HlTAuB2nf/bDMbIUhhVgJvnjPwk+om81laYPHCiRvvwtPs9bCSWVuqLI7AiD0Cd1NP5f MKYLqAMiQjo0Wgk66wnhQ+VUCqN+kDMLinYQOa7UPiZYv8lq7DTpMow/qWkqrJFfWeGI mQVWs5d6Dcjgm15kSlHrTaigVpzIWCDqaNVXioX0kzbkx9GSgZFuJ63FwyR4z2GGQNn6 hxqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G8g24xGQrfijo/+Y5Kp0ABZN80suXVdPWGdIWsCN9C8=; b=S7idv4TWRhB53gMWyAmbFFYYtLc5IiLdUG5B5EGv5SxCfIY45L43r/RNXdVxixlUn2 QrH8Sp0Vn5GdYn3k92rEObhAFUCfRwEg/brrrIAEMlYNBj+UT0eG1ykdwef3gHlPsU7X OTEhyqGBYgim4lLn6cJcI9lMsxfikBnNPSreLak9feRIc3GQhVLmJMrN80fJEUBPBIGM ESy6Mv3315M5abuYGk+CXVj7lO/WCgHAxKCMiXKc/QUy6/c0GBvXCdy9RIhQTrb95W/0 uMGN4ZLdhoUvMO/FNOFUOzc8ZcyjnAJNNkF6daKpe3pAqhd+Aweduubd4eJTUayHr4Tp MK8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FU2ThkjpwBvhhJIU/7gu5h14/Cmf9a+aTwV0ezW3ah5w+x1ZnpCwOyX1mu5PJhv7w== X-Received: by 10.66.246.165 with SMTP id xx5mr27105482pac.87.1463183446849; Fri, 13 May 2016 16:50:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:202:4000:1239:c53a:7e08:2482:8461? ([2601:202:4000:1239:c53a:7e08:2482:8461]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u127sm29913257pfb.82.2016.05.13.16.50.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 13 May 2016 16:50:45 -0700 (PDT) To: Richard Purdie , Martin Jansa , Joshua Lock , Robert Yang References: <20160512141645.GA2567@jama> <1463157281.9746.114.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: akuster808 Message-ID: <57366854.8060203@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 16:50:44 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1463157281.9746.114.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [fido][PATCH 0/1] Undo ABI breakage in OpenSSL X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 23:50:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/13/2016 09:34 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 16:16 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 01:06:33PM +0100, Joshua Lock wrote: >>> The backported upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.2h introduced a newer version >>> of >>> Debian's linker version-script which breaks the OpenSSL ABI. >>> This isn't desirable for a stable release, thus the attached patch >>> reverts >>> the linker-version changes and simply adds the 2 new symbols >>> required by >>> 1.0.2h. >>> >>> Thanks to Martin Jansa for spotting the issue and suggesting a fix. >> >> Thanks for following it and getting it merged so quickly. >> >> It was already merged in fido, can we get the same to jethro (which >> was >> also recently upgraded to 1.0.2h)? > > I'm hoping someone will give me a patch series which does this > correctly for jethro. Its why I haven't taken the previous pull > request. > sent - armin > Cheers, > > Richard > > >