From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147EF60132 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Sep 2015 11:07:51 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,506,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="802487845" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.23.219.25]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Sep 2015 11:07:51 -0700 Received: by linux.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 48) id 235A26A4087; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 10.252.58.194 (SquirrelMail authenticated user alexander.kanavin) by linux.intel.com with HTTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:06:59 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <57616.10.252.58.194.1441908419.squirrel@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <55F1A3D3.30106@gmail.com> References: <0b794c84466fef2ece1269e01820503b4bce0b52.1441753511.git.raj.khem@gmail.com> <63981.10.252.58.194.1441792979.squirrel@linux.intel.com> <64065.10.252.58.194.1441794205.squirrel@linux.intel.com> <32176B14-814F-40D7-A452-86D835E38FCB@gmail.com> <55F1679C.5090508@linux.intel.com> <55F16E82.1070708@gmail.com> <55F172C9.3030601@linux.intel.com> <55F1A3D3.30106@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:06:59 +0300 (EEST) From: alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com To: "akuster808" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el4.centos.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Policy for 'Pending' patches (was Re: [PATCH 02/16] slang: Fix namespace conflict vis-a-vis posix_close) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:07:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >> And the autobuilder could automatically reject or flag a patch that adds >> custom 'Pending' patches, if the patch author is determined to be on the >> 'naughty' list :-) > > That might just alter peoples behavior and change them to use > "Submitted" and still not do anything. It does not address the issue. Of course 'Submitted' must include a proof link of the submission, or a notice that the only way to submit upstream is by private email (which is very rare). Such link is necessary anyway to follow up later what happened with the submission. Regards, Alex