Hi Dmitry,

Can you re-send this as a patch against oe-core itself instead of (presumably) binutils, explaining why it breaks for you and why this is the correct fix?

Thanks,

Ross

On 17 June 2016 at 10:33, Dmitriy Falko <d.falko@partner.samsung.com> wrote:

Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Falko <d.falko@partner.samsung.com>
---
 libc/misc/gnu/obstack.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libc/misc/gnu/obstack.c b/libc/misc/gnu/obstack.c
index 38cfd83..2689263 100644
--- a/libc/misc/gnu/obstack.c
+++ b/libc/misc/gnu/obstack.c
@@ -385,11 +385,11 @@ obstack_free (struct obstack *h, void *obj)
     abort ();
 }

-# if 0
+
 /* Older versions of libc used a function _obstack_free intended to be
    called by non-GCC compilers.  */
 strong_alias (obstack_free, _obstack_free)
-# endif
+

 int
 _obstack_memory_used (struct obstack *h)
--
2.7.4

--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-- 
Best regards,

Falko Dmitrii

Leading Software Engineer

Samsung R&D Institute Rus

Tel. 8(495)797-2500 Ext. 3839; mob. +7(999)528-26-02