From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f65.google.com (mail-pa0-f65.google.com [209.85.220.65]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A058E60118 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f65.google.com with SMTP id hf6so4373821pac.2 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:05:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v7YgrSiz9/llCyBw8+cZxVO3M8z7w1xYLfCDwqu4KJ4=; b=wy7xVPnQyxQlHpjFkKUXi68t+d/MpNEYx2LVmnyLItK9hSlCAZcDvo5ghyDgEJIdvg iZwJ6c8W0yzLiMsysSXn38XVGl4NfyGKDkloAqdYVHAp3/grpEfHDSxfa7SJa61naQZm tB+UAoO2Zx0fwBJ54Rt0bzEFebPgBbYREXjqKtxKu8Cwd1uj901CkDnjMBXP+VDeSnqC 2tqudntwN6/vQzD4QmWabwy4vMGzs3H25X+CfzHDk14sYTjjAQ+zGuyLNB89rlXzprq9 mCSBURvrRcQURnMRO7QKGwLnoppGrFKGEdFq/ZM29QqAGzppmiCWA9WRDJ6eFK0684ie bq5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v7YgrSiz9/llCyBw8+cZxVO3M8z7w1xYLfCDwqu4KJ4=; b=e9jGk8PytyLU2bRrFCFPrbi12qpeoppJL8/MpN+flEroUHVgb5tLoN4pbrS3ji9per 8U0cYX9Gt+AsYUG7WH9yujFGNsXQSdJ1XA8PCjaHlDw5BmDd8In3bkOCdMyiHqDtzG1D YIO00CvJEw/wcXpQcYSj1ESTIJp84lithfezhUoH8N0TFWKnqxxAjqdk+xz5eOtxjLe5 NEAHWP3CMG9V97nPTv+FvLcaWSlG1+VgiXISsrN1UsVHl+DzyY2Fbm81graGvHUBuyH9 38c+w6xsWcuk4NQBqUqlkJYkF43a9GUclHMfWMjAFB51lL0z2KiZm4dsJoHmUDz7cTvC mZYA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI6KdOipaCCJ79GmdK/b54NrFXXo3gXWEUuZNi/W5Af3JeuKiLItlUHiHiJkXygoA== X-Received: by 10.66.253.38 with SMTP id zx6mr35915776pac.19.1466615110243; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:202:4001:9ea0:509e:4be1:bb63:3d6f? ([2601:202:4001:9ea0:509e:4be1:bb63:3d6f]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k74sm1012831pfk.78.2016.06.22.10.05.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:05:08 -0700 (PDT) To: Khem Raj References: <1466609398-17634-1-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> <9FC96606-1A87-49F3-8A49-F692CDF8C2AA@gmail.com> From: akuster808 Message-ID: <576AC542.9020709@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:05:06 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9FC96606-1A87-49F3-8A49-F692CDF8C2AA@gmail.com> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add gcc version and tclibc to build summary X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:05:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 06/22/2016 09:52 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Jun 22, 2016, at 8:29 AM, Armin Kuster wrote: >> >> Since there are two gcc versions supported and any number of tcglibc, >> it would be nice to know which ones are being used. >> Add those to the build summary. >> >> Build summary >> TCLIBC = “glibc" > > libc is evident from TARGET_SYS TARGET_SYS="x86_64-oe-linux", this is not the my intent. The intent is to track which libc is being used. I changed TCLIBC = "musl" local.conf and now build summary show. TCLIBC = "musl" GCC_VERSION = "6.1" Is there a clearer / better way to display this? - armin > >> GCC_VERSION = "6.1" >> >> Not sure if the gcc version bit is best practice. >> >> Armin Kuster (2): >> build summary: add gcc version being used. >> build summary: add TCLIBC being used >> >> meta/classes/base.bbclass | 2 ++ >> meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> -- >> 2.3.5 >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >