From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f176.google.com (mail-pf0-f176.google.com [209.85.192.176]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753D76067C for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 21:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f176.google.com with SMTP id t190so10819772pfb.3 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:34:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6uq3goDsxGtpyMU0xXS8f5Az7gdGlGppz5nLCtFCt/M=; b=wbUlJEDF4ECE3Sdpc63d2gL8Hk1dqG1N1awC/4wf+eYef18tySZAa0K05ud0RcvTR0 B4rmAKEAJ8NrhngOWf9JiJdM/rkZl6zd/fHkkohE16l6qn8UOFhQKDgEqfXkZyEz7AD1 Ce+hsQyeU9wD4ZQXion8ulZvy/4gCr6HSzARL64XFYJCpO2PwmeXErAuEoryL6olzaHA iAJslsUyem6lf+6KmGq7sJG8o8HK2YUUt/WxP8hS/PkGmZpYi/MomT6inFI48ms57Sh9 sm30KZKL0RnJ+D6TTsL5ePTo54o6TLZt//6oGE/OSmU+sryZl9eklck8NvI9b5e55x1N 8IQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6uq3goDsxGtpyMU0xXS8f5Az7gdGlGppz5nLCtFCt/M=; b=MZ9h2P7NgXOvyDzgSoqIYV8/mBK+c4KTu/B9UchMh0iMlL3ltWYsEBmGD46aI1nojA 5EXIeXkeJ6nWmNbYJ01N84ro1tvDdmQE60E3jtEvhmkRyL4tSg9kMVe2VJpmIZjalySB Sw5/h3guEQi7xtwly7i+5/L7vVkshWTlaMEVeLmlZrqFAOkxteKCkk8ZaWVvM3Ya7V0w +4gi7A6yfF7ZzOgXED/yLJ+sTAMBc3wooR6A3kZqpWlk5hlIQk+0C8GsaEdoitEWeAO/ 4QUxgdObDw3gRCth6dsgxYYkU6rc38sfZ8CNKhxrkRk9pEbdwW6KOyQFJ7sqUxRfbBFi k1nw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIW/RJPbp2Xfn1wqjqptAAUiAE1Ae1UD0e98g57/1Pf6hzKmp3P9x8BNJLkaWRuwA== X-Received: by 10.98.27.200 with SMTP id b191mr23251290pfb.111.1468359295725; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:34:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.43.100.29] ([50.233.148.158]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g189sm6375378pfc.46.2016.07.12.14.34.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:34:54 -0700 (PDT) To: "Burton, Ross" References: <5784A2D0.9030902@mlbassoc.com> <57855DCA.1080807@gmail.com> From: akuster808 Message-ID: <5785627D.9080800@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:34:53 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Gary Thomas , OE-core Subject: Re: Future of GCC X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 21:34:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/12/2016 02:24 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 12 July 2016 at 22:14, akuster808 wrote: > >>> Personally I was thinking that gcc 5.x and 6.x should stay in oe-core for >>> this cycle, and then drop 5.x after the release. >> >> >> Wouldn't that be dropped iff GCC 7.0 is release? or are you saying we >> should only have one GCC version? >> > > Well, depends on the adoption and migration problems. I don't think we > should carry three versions, I agree. 3 is too many. and ideally one, but two is acceptable to ease > migration. One makes Stable maintenance less costly in time. - armin > > Ross >