From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.analogue-micro.com (mail.analogue-micro.com [217.144.149.242]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982426067C for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.analogue-micro.com (Postfix, from userid 999) id 341C068A019; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:41:08 +0100 (BST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on loki.analogue-micro-ltd.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from zeus.mlbassoc.com (unknown [10.8.0.2]) by mail.analogue-micro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F4E68A019; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:41:07 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.mlbassoc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263C36740256; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:41:07 +0200 (CEST) To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <20160713142422.aihj4b5qmni7uair@jama> From: Gary Thomas Message-ID: <57865303.30805@mlbassoc.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:41:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160713142422.aihj4b5qmni7uair@jama> Subject: Re: Downloads from sourceforge.net X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:41:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2016-07-13 16:24, Martin Jansa wrote: > Just FYI > > If you're seeing a lot of do_fetch failures because of SRC_URI checksums > mismatch, be aware that there is some issue with sourceforge.net, all my > source archive downloads (with wget) download just this HTML: > > wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/gptfdisk/gptfdisk/0.8.10/gptfdisk-0.8.10.tar.gz > > > SourceForge > > > > > > > > > > Which of course has different checksums than tarball with sources. > > You can see similar message if you try to access e.g. their blog (to find out if it's already > known issue for them): > http://sourceforge.net/blog/ > or > http://sourceforge.net/blog/category/sitestatus/ > > Until it's resolved continue to use your better-be-already-populated premirrors. It seems to have been short lived - I had this issue with docbook-xsl-1.79.1.tar.bz2 and the second time I tried it (a few minutes later) it was fine. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------