From: "Aníbal Limón" <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
To: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>,
ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org,
Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>,
Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.7% build time regression caused by enabling debug/printk.scc KERNEL_FEATURE
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:19:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57978D8B.7080204@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <579781A4.707@windriver.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8025 bytes --]
Hi,
I was thinking about how many more times takes to build and run the 2.7%
for me is reasonable since it's only enabled on qemu machines for
debugging purposes.
One alternative will be only enable this feature in AB builds another
one is that RP suggest to split into more kernel configurations
printk.cfg and printk_early.cfg and see how many more time takes only
with printk. [1]
+ RP and Saul
[1]
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-kernel-cache/tree/features/debug/printk.cfg
alimon
On 07/26/2016 10:28 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2016-07-26 10:32 AM, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've noticed quite big increase of core-image-minimal build time
>> caused by commit
>> d55b7650d305ffad953dd36595ee6b9aa8df5a72 linux-yocto: Enablei
>> debug/printk.scc KERNEL_FEATURE on qemuall machines.
>>
>
> That commit only enables the following options:
>
> CONFIG_PRINTK=y
> CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y
>
> CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y
>
> CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK_DBGP=y
> CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK_EFI=y
> CONFIG_TTY_PRINTK=y
>
> And yes, that will add some size to the kernel, but I'm not seeing
> similar size increases here.
>
> If you take a look through the kernel source and build, there are
> relatively few additions to the actual kernel build that change
> based on those options, and most of them are runtime changes versus
> build-time changes.
>
>> Here are results of /usr/bin/time -v bitbake core-image-minimal for this
>> and previous commits:
>>
>> linux-yocto: Enable debug/printk.scc KERNEL_FEATURE on qemuall
>> machines: d55b7650d305ffad953dd36595ee6b9aa8df5a72
>> Command being timed: "bitbake core-image-minimal"
>> User time (seconds): 14966.24
>> System time (seconds): 3829.23
>> Percent of CPU this job got: 1212%
>> Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 25:50.52
>> Average shared text size (kbytes): 0
>> Average unshared data size (kbytes): 0
>> Average stack size (kbytes): 0
>> Average total size (kbytes): 0
>> Maximum resident set size (kbytes): 917592
>> Average resident set size (kbytes): 0
>> Major (requiring I/O) page faults: 8105
>> Minor (reclaiming a frame) page faults: 628476540
>> Voluntary context switches: 26886617
>> Involuntary context switches: 2033535
>> Swaps: 0
>> File system inputs: 3160048
>> File system outputs: 78417720
>> Socket messages sent: 0
>> Socket messages received: 0
>> Signals delivered: 0
>> Page size (bytes): 4096
>> Exit status: 0
>>
>> commit: nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host: Add wayland-scanner to the
>> SDK native toolchain: e833508075bcb8f2d1ccddcf46f579aea7a2ab1d
>> Command being timed: "bitbake core-image-minimal"
>> User time (seconds): 14526.89
>> System time (seconds): 3770.74
>> Percent of CPU this job got: 1193%
>> Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 25:33.44
>> Average shared text size (kbytes): 0
>> Average unshared data size (kbytes): 0
>> Average stack size (kbytes): 0
>> Average total size (kbytes): 0
>> Maximum resident set size (kbytes): 917792
>> Average resident set size (kbytes): 0
>> Major (requiring I/O) page faults: 8058
>> Minor (reclaiming a frame) page faults: 618283939
>> Voluntary context switches: 26538183
>> Involuntary context switches: 1859365
>> Swaps: 0
>> File system inputs: 3191584
>> File system outputs: 66411592
>> Socket messages sent: 0
>> Socket messages received: 0
>> Signals delivered: 0
>> Page size (bytes): 4096
>> Exit status: 0
>>
>> The total time (user time + system time) incresed by 2.72% which seems
>> quite a lot.
>>
>> diff of tasks utime shows biggest difference in do_package* tasks.
>> This is probably
>> due to increased size of packages:
>>
>> do_bundle_initramfs:utime: 21 | do_bundle_initramfs:utime: 32
>> do_compile:utime: 47 | do_compile:utime: 51
>> do_compile_kernelmodules:utime: 39 |
>> do_compile_kernelmodules:utime: 42
>> do_configure:utime: 20 | do_configure:utime: 24
>> do_deploy:utime: 38 | do_deploy:utime: 35
>> do_fetch:utime: 25 | do_fetch:utime: 28
>> do_install:utime: 26 | do_install:utime: 22
>> do_kernel_checkout:utime: 21 | do_kernel_checkout:utime: 24
>> do_kernel_configcheck:utime: 21 | do_kernel_configcheck:utime: 21
>> do_kernel_configme:utime: 23 | do_kernel_configme:utime: 23
>> do_kernel_link_images:utime: 24 | do_kernel_link_images:utime: 22
>> do_kernel_metadata:utime: 25 | do_kernel_metadata:utime: 23
>> do_package:utime: 396 | do_package:utime: 378
>> do_packagedata:utime: 35 | do_packagedata:utime: 34
>> do_package_qa:utime: 460 | do_package_qa:utime: 492
>> do_package_write_rpm:utime: 431 | do_package_write_rpm:utime: 399
>> do_patch:utime: 25 | do_patch:utime: 25
>> do_populate_lic:utime: 30 | do_populate_lic:utime: 29
>> do_populate_sysroot:utime: 33 | do_populate_sysroot:utime: 30
>> do_shared_workdir:utime: 24 | do_shared_workdir:utime: 25
>> do_sizecheck:utime: 23 | do_sizecheck:utime: 21
>> do_strip:utime: 23 | do_strip:utime: 23
>> do_uboot_mkimage:utime: 25 | do_uboot_mkimage:utime: 24
>> do_unpack:utime: 21 | do_unpack:utime: 22
>> do_validate_branches:utime: 23 | do_validate_branches:utime: 24
>>
>> There is also quite big increase in consumed disk space by the kernel
>> and modules:
>> $ ls -lh
>> ./tmp.bad/work/qemux86-poky-linux/linux-yocto/4.4.14+gitAUTOINC+4800a400d5_8361321fec-r0/image/boot/vmlinux-4.4.14-yocto-standard
>>
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ed ed 261M Jul 25 12:39
>> ./tmp.bad/work/qemux86-poky-linux/linux-yocto/4.4.14+gitAUTOINC+4800a400d5_8361321fec-r0/image/boot/vmlinux-4.4.14-yocto-standard
>>
>> $ ls -lh
>> ./tmp.prev/work/qemux86-poky-linux/linux-yocto/4.4.14+gitAUTOINC+4800a400d5_8361321fec-r0/image/boot/vmlinux-4.4.14-yocto-standard
>>
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ed ed 19M Jul 25 17:34
>> ./tmp.prev/work/qemux86-poky-linux/linux-yocto/4.4.14+gitAUTOINC+4800a400d5_8361321fec-r0/image/boot/vmlinux-4.4.14-yocto-standard
>>
>>
>> $ ls -lh
>> tmp.bad/deploy/images/qemux86/modules--4.4.14+git0+4800a400d5_8361321fec-r0-qemux86-20160725092744.tgz
>>
>> -rw-rw-r-- 2 ed ed 99M Jul 25 12:39
>> tmp.bad/deploy/images/qemux86/modules--4.4.14+git0+4800a400d5_8361321fec-r0-qemux86-20160725092744.tgz
>>
>> $ ls -lh
>> tmp.prev/deploy/images/qemux86/modules--4.4.14+git0+4800a400d5_8361321fec-r0-qemux86-20160725105810.tgz
>>
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 ed ed 4.3M Jul 25 17:34
>> tmp.prev/deploy/images/qemux86/modules--4.4.14+git0+4800a400d5_8361321fec-r0-qemux86-20160725105810.tgz
>>
>>
>> Any thoughts on this? Is it normal or it should be tested further and
>> fixed?
>
> I'm not sure that this is related to the debug printk build, but
> anything that that could be increasing footprint and build time
> like that should be looked into.
>
> Without messing with the oe-core commit that enabled the feature, has
> someone done a build, gone into the kernel .config, disabled the options
> and then rebuilt ? I'd start there to rule out that the option is
> actually doing something that significant to the build itself.
>
> .. but I can't say much more than that, since as you can see by the
> commit, I'm not on the sign-off list, so I don't have all the background.
>
> Bruce
>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Ed
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-26 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-26 14:32 2.7% build time regression caused by enabling debug/printk.scc KERNEL_FEATURE Ed Bartosh
2016-07-26 15:28 ` Bruce Ashfield
2016-07-26 16:19 ` Aníbal Limón [this message]
2016-07-26 20:05 ` Aníbal Limón
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57978D8B.7080204@linux.intel.com \
--to=anibal.limon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sgw@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox