From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96D86FF60 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id u817APVp016183 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 00:10:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.229] (128.224.162.229) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 00:10:24 -0700 To: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" From: ChenQi Message-ID: <57C7D481.1070502@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 15:10:57 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.229] Subject: 'qemumips64 + systemd + pam' results in being not able to login X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 07:10:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi All, Recently I noticed that if we start a systemd based qemumips64 target with 'pam' enabled in DISTRO_FEATURES, we could not login in successfully. After you provide username and password to the login prompt, the login prompt just comes up again. Below is some error information. Received SIGCHLD from PID 175 (login). Child 175 (login) died (code=dumped, status=10/BUS) serial-getty@ttyS0.service: Child 175 belongs to serial-getty@ttyS0.service serial-getty@ttyS0.service: Main process exited, code=dumped, status=10/BUS I've investigated this problem, but I could not find the root cause. Has any of you also seen the same problem? Anyone has any idea what's going on here? Best Regards, Chen Qi