Re: [PATCHv2] db: Upgrade to 6.0.35

["Aníbal Limón" <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1698 bytes --]



On 09/28/2016 11:30 AM, Julien Gueytat wrote:
> Related to the db recipe. There are also the patches that needs to be
> regenerated as the same patches are applied for the two current versions.
> At least on Ubuntu 16.06 the same patch can't be applied anymore on the
> two versions as the lines where to apply the patches differs too much.

This is a quite strange, i'm wondering why can't be applied, i expect if
a patch fails in configure/compile stages not at patch apply.

Could you put here the error log please?

	alimon

>
> 
> Le 28/09/2016 18:24, Burton, Ross a écrit :
>>
>> On 28 September 2016 at 17:06, Aníbal Limón
>> <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com <mailto:anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     @@ -18,16 +18,15 @@ RCONFLICTS_${PN} = "db3"
>>      PR = "r1"
>>
>>
>> Remove this PR please.
>>
>>      # Note, when upgraded to 6.1.x, a patch in RPM will need to be
>>     removed to activate db 6.1 support.
>>     -
>>     -SRC_URI = "http://download.oracle.com/berkeley-db/db-${PV}.tar.gz
>>     <http://download.oracle.com/berkeley-db/db-$%7BPV%7D.tar.gz> \
>>     +SRC_URI = "http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/db-${PV}.tar.gz
>>     <http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/db-$%7BPV%7D.tar.gz> \
>>
>>
>> What is distfiles.gentoo.org <http://distfiles.gentoo.org>'s policy
>> when db-6.0.36 is released?  Could the tarball be deleted the day
>> after we release?  In general we've been either using
>> snapshot.debian.org <http://snapshot.debian.org> or pointing directly
>> at the yoctoproject.org <http://yoctoproject.org> source mirror for
>> tarballs we can't rely upon over time.
>>
>> Ross
>>
>>
> 
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]