Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kang Kai <Kai.Kang@windriver.com>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-sanitizers: allow empty for lsan and tsan packages
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:02:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58009F43.6070904@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LaFVw6oUW5jL7kR-B3TWenNwowGRzcG8=5K=CGqPFx+5w@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1294 bytes --]

On 2016年10月13日 22:59, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 13 October 2016 at 15:40, Kang Kai <Kai.Kang@windriver.com 
> <mailto:Kai.Kang@windriver.com>> wrote:
>
>     gcc checks tsan and lsan support in source file
>     gcc/libsanitizer/configure.tgt, it seems only support x86_64. Then
>     tsan and lsan related packages will be empty for other target.
>     For qemuarm project, add in local.conf:
>
>     IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " libtsan"
>
>
> If libtsan is x86-64 only, why not only add it for x86-64 images?  The 
> package not existing on machines it can't be built for is more obvious 
> than existing but being empty.

The real scenario is for x86-64 kernel with x86 rootfs. We created a 
template to enable gcc sanitize support. It just simple adds sanitize 
related packages to image:

LIBX_DEV ?= ""
LIBX_DEV_x86-64 = "liblsan-dev libtsan-dev"

IMAGE_INSTALL += " \
     gcc-sanitizers \
     libasan-dev \
     libubsan-dev \
     ${LIBX_DEV} \
"

When multilib is enabled, it fails for x86-64 kernel with x86 rootfs 
such as lib32-xxx-image on qemux86-64. Var IMAGE_INSTALL will be expand 
with prefix lib32 but lib32-lsan* and lib32-tsan* are empty then cause 
the failures.

Regards,
Kai

>
> Ross


-- 
Regards,
Neil | Kai Kang


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2997 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-14  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-12  2:37 [PATCH] gcc-sanitizers: allow empty for lsan and tsan packages kai.kang
2016-10-12  9:26 ` Burton, Ross
2016-10-13 14:40   ` Kang Kai
2016-10-13 14:59     ` Burton, Ross
2016-10-14  9:02       ` Kang Kai [this message]
2016-10-14  9:32         ` Khem Raj
2016-10-17  5:52           ` Kang Kai
2016-10-17 13:29             ` Khem Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58009F43.6070904@windriver.com \
    --to=kai.kang@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox