From: Randy MacLeod <randy.macleod@windriver.com>
To: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>, Randy MacLeod <rwmacleod@gmail.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core][kirkstone 00/27] Patch review
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:27:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b865e71-f562-5fdf-e283-bb3b16000df1@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOSpxdaOqjOFv7RaB-+ym7OZEji1tL5S6C08WAuOGLGnarWV6w@mail.gmail.com>
On 2022-04-21 10:00, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 7:14 PM Randy MacLeod <rwmacleod@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed., Apr. 20, 2022, 10:54 Steve Sakoman, <steve@sakoman.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 4:08 AM Steve Sakoman via
>>> lists.openembedded.org <steve=sakoman.com@lists.openembedded.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Please review this set of patches for kirkstone and have comments back by
>>>> end of day Friday.
>>> I'd particularly like feedback on the security/bug fix version updates
>>> at the end of this series.
>>>
>>> In the past I took these only on request.
>>>
>>> Would people like me to be more proactive on this type of upgrade
>>> (such as this series), or should I continue to take them only on
>>> request?
>> Proactive but reasonably cautious. ;-)
> That's my feeling too.
>
>>>> Passed a-full on autobuilder:
>>>>
>>>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/83/builds/3547
>>>>
>>>> The following changes since commit d2ba3b8850d461bc7b773240cdf15b22b31a3f9e:
>>>>
>>>> lua: fix CVE-2022-28805 (2022-04-19 14:02:08 +0100)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>>>
>>>> git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib stable/kirkstone-nut
>>>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=stable/kirkstone-nut
>>>>
>>>> Alexander Kanavin (1):
>>>> webkitgtk: adjust patch status
>>>>
>>>> Davide Gardenal (1):
>>>> create-spdx: fix error when symlink cannot be created
>>>>
>>>> Ferry Toth (2):
>>>> apt: add apt selftest to test signed package feeds
>>>> package_manager: fix missing dependency on gnupg when signing deb
>>>> package feeds
>>>>
>>>> Jon Mason (1):
>>>> qemuarm64: use virtio pci interfaces
>>>>
>>>> Kai Kang (1):
>>>> update_udev_hwdb: fix multilib issue with systemd
>>>>
>>>> Khem Raj (5):
>>>> babeltrace: Disable warnings as errors
>>>> xserver-xorg: Fix build with gcc12
>>>> systemtap: Fix build with gcc-12
>>>> gnupg: Disable FORTIFY_SOURCES on mips
>>>> mdadm: Drop clang specific cflags
>>>>
>>>> Konrad Weihmann (2):
>>>> git: correct license
>>>> ncurses: use COPYING file
>>>>
>>>> Martin Jansa (1):
>>>> systemd-boot: remove outdated EFI_LD comment
>>>>
>>>> Paulo Neves (1):
>>>> selftest/lic_checksum: Add test for filename containing space
>>>>
>>>> Peter Kjellerstedt (2):
>>>> u-boot: Correct the SRC_URI
>>>> u-boot: Inherit pkgconfig
>>>>
>>>> Richard Purdie (1):
>>>> buildtools-tarball: Only add cert envvars if certs are included
>>>>
>>>> Ross Burton (1):
>>>> zlib: upgrade to 1.2.12
>>>>
>>>> wangmy (5):
>>>> linux-firmware: upgrade 20220310 -> 20220411
>>
>> It's firmware so it should be fine but I don't know much about such things. Have firmware updates ever broken older kernels?
>> Certainly there could be performance degradation. I guess it's a release note item for others to worry about.
> I've been doing these regularly for dunfell and it hasn't been an
> issue in the past two years.
As expected but that's good to hear.
>
>>>> libsoup: upgrade 3.0.5 -> 3.0.6
>>>> apt: upgrade 2.4.3 -> 2.4.4
>>>> libusb1: upgrade 1.0.25 -> 1.0.26
>>>> libgit2: upgrade 1.4.2 -> 1.4.3
>>>>
>>>> zhengruoqin (3):
>>>> wireless-regdb: upgrade 2022.02.18 -> 2022.04.08
>>>> git: upgrade 2.35.2 -> 2.35.3
>>>> ruby: upgrade 3.1.1 -> 3.1.2
>> These all seem like bug fix only updates.
>> Are you assuming that third number updates don't change API/ABI or looking at commit summaries, git logs, or using a tool?
> Yes, my criteria for including is that they are bug/security only updates.
>
> I don't assume anything from the version number, I review the release
> notes (if any) and the git logs. In many cases the version updates in
> master don't include this info in the commit message. In that case I
> add either the release notes or the git log to the commit message when
> cherry-picking from master.
That's great. The only better response would be if we could run API/ABI
test.
I'll see if that's something that we can work on for release branches
but no promises
or timeline for that so far.
>
> So it is a time consuming manual process :-)
It is; thanks for the careful work.
>
> BTW, those who include release notes or commit logs in their version
> bumps get smiles and brownie points from me!
+1
../Randy
>
> Steve
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#164762): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/164762
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/90584508/3616765
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [randy.macleod@windriver.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <16E7A00050A35F84.23874@lists.openembedded.org>
2022-04-20 14:53 ` [OE-core][kirkstone 00/27] Patch review Steve Sakoman
2022-04-20 15:05 ` Khem Raj
2022-04-21 5:14 ` Randy MacLeod
2022-04-21 14:00 ` Steve Sakoman
2022-04-21 14:27 ` Randy MacLeod [this message]
2025-06-17 21:19 Steve Sakoman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-07-18 14:25 Steve Sakoman
2023-02-12 21:10 Steve Sakoman
2022-07-14 4:35 Steve Sakoman
2022-04-20 14:07 Steve Sakoman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b865e71-f562-5fdf-e283-bb3b16000df1@windriver.com \
--to=randy.macleod@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=rwmacleod@gmail.com \
--cc=steve@sakoman.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox