From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail5.wrs.com (mail5.windriver.com [192.103.53.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98C77D5BE for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail5.wrs.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7RIQvL8031261 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:27:32 -0700 Received: from soho-mhatle-m.local (172.25.36.226) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.468.0; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:27:06 -0700 To: Adrian Bunk , Khem Raj References: <20190816194405.12751-1-wesley.lindauer@gmail.com> <20190816194405.12751-6-wesley.lindauer@gmail.com> <20190827180449.GA29638@localhost> From: Mark Hatle Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=mark.hatle@windriver.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFYKxFgBCACt/pzutBp6p/xVKTFJjHbM3KpQKCblyot/YP+bpTr51Hrc5xDXBQhoG7TC aIRvRIvbhEevEQK9y04gW3JK/5lobq5ORebolcsHlYBUvpNeIPjupLQwGvz/TPtrLRNGLqDC rvsM6OA2XbQ2bwzxWaSQS3ImE2O2iXOZn9HhThMGeDB4Nff3fgUvXOTDIrgWOn9K2DgLL7Yc zkUIlFdj+Nraksd/7BSk8oH6tjeBVhFqSFvKta9QxWgdr58oPaTYaW/xNqUjlLrbJuMw/MSe xzuYfdfDfm6J8kRjMOnwQ0n8svJElzqAk+d83ow38gpGQ+LkjGgnf8ZFJ4rUJFADroX3ABEB AAG0JU1hcmsgSGF0bGUgPG1hcmsuaGF0bGVAd2luZHJpdmVyLmNvbT6JATcEEwEIACEFAlYK xFgCGwMFCwkIBwIGFQgJCgsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQfv796/r0vvlvZAf9Gs+eN320yhRW V/fZCsngKhmOK4v3HrTwFrkSmoD9QHQiE/5IPdNacHwIPwZx07tNBohB8xOeNqCPRYRBwGhA AnxKOPyd0nnm6ZhPzbA57v4x3IGRQr4QzvcBTASJq91l3Ew4lpAslyx5w1DPPqRD7G8ycDKg peKyDwmdkvCunVisSAQI3XIMq2y230biTO98tDPEezg+lg+yTsz9ZT33F5KNuWrpf8VL5fG/ mt+kAv7wtsx/KTRbqhH3iFXF6eBSwMjAfTXFlkLfbM9riJGXrWEl9n2S2R3cDHNHug0lb8f4 whK370KEO4OwRKIYW/VUBmzk5XZUE9DTlDSV8ycsrrkBDQRWCsRYAQgAwK3FuHCE+HW3YWdH PUjeSn5p//xJ57u8g2rng8zm9zNjmYgpPv5UxozaD9i2jf4mlQLHGGOezhHae8K4Nj70oVcv 8AmwcrJa9i9WL1oy/9R3fHMWf/Ctt9VXTO0qlCuq6PDzaUfvsXR61aJIjTKNQTOjCLjY1vXm VSewUgARysmA8WrjTfwGBihMBxAX0+kIjx8nOlam0WvekMBXZ0AbS56oTLRxYao6DI3GeB/N oWPy/5DfuTKaSdM0Pf8al20x9RuNN5/HLMlyDH/k8bIa1xd9aAqW+Feiw5gC107V2E6ULyIy q6em2UrsmIRxrvpHqbNgQKqvTehJ+V/i4g/uOwARAQABiQEfBBgBCAAJBQJWCsRYAhsMAAoJ EH7+/ev69L755XAH/3ZcNhooqd9OBhFkvXm1iWZ8EoC7motWqVn2oEyxoonsg8AD9kFXiN+T dYp7dH99EZu9q4ptj56AXm4uHzOgywL/5/V2TY6twCGAjUGzDjAB5gzoi+JLIBlDiyOip0eL QswIhRk473xy3j8DA4oVamnSPWgyNJ+qsdt37YWDzoDFFvtDoRU7Eb+znfIMDKzlny0XU/8L cW1bNHJlpv/78GPdfP4tjysEd8MuA5jf5o5w4XqcwTqalffEJtQ/s3pbkstEi7qm5uPui5Kt gq6YYLSqcSNe0GWAF9/T+qwyo7burSTxUWCWtMmlXdAQLW9SynLhB3Jbch0nFAh0fCKi6yY= Organization: Wind River Systems Message-ID: <5fc12556-a817-e312-e1ed-60878a97d78c@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 13:27:05 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190827180449.GA29638@localhost> Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] xz: Remove GPLv3 license checksum X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:28:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 8/27/19 1:04 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:50:14PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:46 PM Wes Lindauer wrote: >>> >>> Although xz has some files that are GPLv3 licensed, none of them get >>> packaged up, and therefore none of it ends up in the final rootfs. Since >>> there is no GPLv3 code in the final image, we don't want to include it >>> when we collect licenses, as that would give the incorrect impression >>> that the image contains GPLv3 code. >> >> We will be distributing this in src packages though. Maybe these files >> should be deleted before the build even starts. > > OE does licence tracking on binary packages, not on source packages. It tracks -both-. Since MOST recipes and binary packages agree, people don't often know this. LICENSE is the -recipe source license-. Nothing more nothing less. It typically does NOT include the license of things used to build the software (such as makefiles, autoconf fragments, etc), but must include the license of any sources that are or may be used to construct binaries. LICENSE_ is automatically defined as LICENSE. If a binary package has a difference license (which must ALWAYS be a subset of the recipe LICENSE), then it can be specified independently. See sysfsutils as an example: LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2.1" LICENSE_${PN} = "GPLv2" LICENSE_libsysfs = "LGPLv2.1" recipe is made of of source code consisting of GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1. The LICENSE_${PN} is expected to be GPLv2, while the LICENSE_libsysfs is expected to be LGPLv2.1. The LIC_FILES_CHKSUM is supposed to represent the -recipe- source license. If the component is used to build the binaries, then it needs to be listed (but only has to be listed once). If the component MIGHT be used, it needs to be listed. If the component will NOT be used, then it should not be listed (and it's advised to remove it from the source to avoid accidental usage...) --Mark > There are recipes that build binary packages with different licences > from the same sources. > > cu > Adrian >