From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624146014F for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 May 2016 02:09:03 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,367,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="989106138" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.23.219.25]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 May 2016 02:08:59 -0700 Received: by linux.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 48) id 626756A4008; Thu, 26 May 2016 02:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 10.252.8.31 (SquirrelMail authenticated user alexander.kanavin) by linux.intel.com with HTTP; Thu, 26 May 2016 12:56:29 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <62087.10.252.8.31.1464256589.squirrel@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <61959.10.252.8.31.1464255292.squirrel@linux.intel.com> References: <285302afb2b9fb0a868aeda0cbfa3ea956702793.1464176988.git.jussi.kukkonen@intel.com> <52090.10.252.8.31.1464187330.squirrel@linux.intel.com> <61959.10.252.8.31.1464255292.squirrel@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 12:56:29 +0300 (EEST) From: alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com To: alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el4.centos.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] gnupg.org-hosted recipes: Change SRC_URI to https site X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 09:09:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > How can you be sure that other index.html files aren't similarly out of > date? We should stick to the ftp directory listings for upstream checks > until the upstream sorts this. I'm not sure if the patch should be held > off altogether, or fixed so that the upstream check uri explicitly points > to ftp for each affected recipe. Right, here's another out of date index.html, so they simply cannot be relied on: https://www.gnupg.org/ftp/gcrypt/pinentry/ I think we can solve this, if for everything except gnutls, upstream check uri is set to https://www.gnupg.org/download/index.html (perhaps via a class). For gnutls, it should still be set to the ftp: ftp://ftp.gnutls.org/gcrypt/gnutls/ Alex