Re: [OE-core] [wrynose][PATCH 01/20] recipeutils: add optional stable_upgrade parameter to get_recipe_upgrade_status

[Daniel Turull <daniel.turull@ericsson.com>]

On Wed, 2026-09-16 at 16:05 +0200, Yoann Congal wrote:
> On Wed Sep 2, 2026 at 11:59 AM CEST, Daniel Turull via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > From: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
> > 
> > We want the ability to do stable version upgrades for recipes.
> > To this end, add an optional stable_upgrade parameter to the
> > get_recipe_upgrade_status function, which defaults to False and
> > when enabled will try to get the latest stable version of the recipe.
> > 
> > The UPSTREAM_STABLE_RELEASE_REGEX is respected. If a recipe sets
> > it, it will be used as the filter_regex. If it's not set explicitly,
> > it means that there's no stable updates or the recipe hasn't been
> > checked yet.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Antonin Godard <antonin.godard@bootlin.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> > (cherry picked from commit 1ed8fdda035dcc21f3df71c0c996973224f4f683)
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Turull <daniel.turull@ericsson.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py b/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py
> > index c6604f536d..7c1df518a8 100644
> > --- a/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py
> > +++ b/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py
> > @@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ def get_recipe_pv_with_pfx_sfx(pv, uri_type):
> >  
> >      return (pv, pfx, sfx)
> >  
> > -def get_recipe_upstream_version(rd):
> > +def get_recipe_upstream_version(rd, stable_upgrade):
> 
> I plan to backport the follow-up as well:
> 6f8ae1ecf38 (lib/oe/recipeutils: make stable_upgrade argument optional in get_recipe_upstream_version(), 2026-06-08)
> 
> What do you think?
Yes, I think we should backported so it is the same as in master.

Daniel
> 
> Thanks!