From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B19574242 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 10:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Sep 2015 03:24:17 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,496,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="558203793" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.23.219.25]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Sep 2015 03:24:17 -0700 Received: by linux.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2E0986A408F; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 03:23:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 10.252.58.194 (SquirrelMail authenticated user alexander.kanavin) by linux.intel.com with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:23:25 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <64065.10.252.58.194.1441794205.squirrel@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <63981.10.252.58.194.1441792979.squirrel@linux.intel.com> References: <0b794c84466fef2ece1269e01820503b4bce0b52.1441753511.git.raj.khem@gmail.com> <63981.10.252.58.194.1441792979.squirrel@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:23:25 +0300 (EEST) From: alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el4.centos.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] slang: Fix namespace conflict vis-a-vis posix_close X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:24:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >> +Exposed while compiling on musl >> + >> +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj >> +--- >> +Upstream-Status: Pending > > If this has been submitted upstream (as you say in the cover letter for > this patchset), please provide a link for the submission in the > upstream-status. We can't afford to let the amount of 'Pending' patches in > oe-core grow indefinitely. > > Same goes for other patches in this set. Actually scratch the above, it was too hasty. What I really wanted to say is that, ideally, you should first submit the patches upstream, have a prooflink of that, and only then send them here with that proof in the upstream-status. There are already too many eternal 'Pending' patches in oe-core that never made it to upsream. We can't afford more of them. Regards, Alex