diff for duplicates of <659490.1768491691095926188@lists.openembedded.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index ca2ad5c..fc8de52 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Hi Daniel, -I just pushed a V2 of my patch here: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229419. ( https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229419 ) +I just pushed a V2 of my patch here: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229434. I added variables to add a deterministic entry if wanted, an offline mode based on DL_DIR, and a second .bbclass for SPDX2.2. I can't put SPDX 2.2 and SPDX3.0 in the same class as the task scheduling is very different and a single task won't be able to handle both. diff --git a/a/2.bin b/N1/2.bin index eea70d2..b53c024 100644 --- a/a/2.bin +++ b/N1/2.bin @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ <div>Hi Daniel, </div> <div> </div> -<div>I just pushed a V2 of my patch here: <a href="https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229419" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229419.</a></div> +<div>I just pushed a V2 of my patch here: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229434.</div> <div>I added variables to add a deterministic entry if wanted, an offline mode based on DL_DIR, and a second .bbclass for SPDX2.2.</div> <div> </div> <div>I can't put SPDX 2.2 and SPDX3.0 in the same class as the task scheduling is very different and a single task won't be able to handle both. </div> diff --git a/a/2.hdr b/N1/2.hdr index 24bd2b6..6a9de1e 100644 --- a/a/2.hdr +++ b/N1/2.hdr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 1a95166..9ce7161 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,13 +2,13 @@ "ref\0PA3PR07MB1072143D325ABB3729C5010D88A85A@PA3PR07MB10721.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com\0" "From\0vboudevin <valentin.boudevin@gmail.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] improve_kerne_cve_report: Add a bbclass support\0" - "Date\0Thu, 15 Jan 2026 07:41:31 -0800\0" + "Date\0Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:12:50 -0800\0" "To\0openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org\0" "\01:1\0" "b\0" "Hi Daniel,\n" "\n" - "I just pushed a V2 of my patch here: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229419. ( https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229419 )\n" + "I just pushed a V2 of my patch here: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229434.\n" "I added variables to add a deterministic entry if wanted, an offline mode based on DL_DIR, and a second .bbclass for SPDX2.2.\n" "\n" "I can't put SPDX 2.2 and SPDX3.0 in the same class as the task scheduling is very different and a single task won't be able to handle both.\n" @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ "b\0" "<div>Hi Daniel, </div>\r\n" "<div> </div>\r\n" - "<div>I just pushed a V2 of my patch here: <a href=\"https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229419\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229419.</a></div>\r\n" + "<div>I just pushed a V2 of my patch here: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229434.</div>\r\n" "<div>I added variables to add a deterministic entry if wanted, an offline mode based on DL_DIR, and a second .bbclass for SPDX2.2.</div>\r\n" "<div> </div>\r\n" "<div>I can't put SPDX 2.2 and SPDX3.0 in the same class as the task scheduling is very different and a single task won't be able to handle both. </div>\r\n" @@ -27,4 +27,4 @@ "<div> </div>\r\n" "<div>Do you see any other issue to solve for the current two bbclass?</div>\r\n" -0030334e8f8b957b4a7b7961d989a27616b3cc9172bfbe37c473fc7f5c64be51 +60a907dabac3639ce26d162e5145cb07e82c54664fa6c99052616b48e7c18859
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox