From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E28CD44C6B for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] improve_kerne_cve_report: Add a bbclass support To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org From: "vboudevin" X-Originating-Location: Laval, Quebec, CA (208.88.110.46) X-Originating-Platform: Linux Firefox 146 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 07:41:31 -0800 References: <20260106194202.3402355-1-valentin.boudevin@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <659490.1768491691095926188@lists.openembedded.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="IZvIMz9tl2L1nu06CN8N" List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:41:34 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229421 --IZvIMz9tl2L1nu06CN8N Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Daniel, I just pushed a V2 of my patch here: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/opene= mbedded-core/message/229419. ( https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedde= d-core/message/229419 ) I added variables to add a deterministic entry if wanted, an offline mode b= ased on DL_DIR, and a second .bbclass for SPDX2.2. I can't put SPDX 2.2 and SPDX3.0 in the same class as the task scheduling i= s very different and a single task won't be able to handle both. I want to add a third class for debug-source scenario but it is going to ta= ke me some time. Do you see any other issue to solve for the current two bbclass? --IZvIMz9tl2L1nu06CN8N Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Daniel, 
 
I added variables to add a deterministic entry if wanted, an offline m= ode based on DL_DIR, and a second .bbclass for SPDX2.2.
 
I can't put SPDX 2.2 and SPDX3.0 in the same class as the task schedul= ing is very different and a single task won't be able to handle both. =
I want to add a third class for debug-source scenario but it is going = to take me some time. 
 
Do you see any other issue to solve for the current two bbclass?
--IZvIMz9tl2L1nu06CN8N-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BE4D4661A for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] improve_kerne_cve_report: Add a bbclass support To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org From: "vboudevin" X-Originating-Location: Laval, Quebec, CA (208.88.110.46) X-Originating-Platform: Linux Firefox 146 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:12:50 -0800 References: <20260106194202.3402355-1-valentin.boudevin@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <659490.1768491691095926188@lists.openembedded.org> X-Old-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 07:41:31 -0800 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="IZvIMz9tl2L1nu06CN8N" List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:12:57 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229421 Message-ID: <20260115191250.YKkH2rrDY5zibRYuUUXLB-gsVGZPpsmQUmFrSOfBiFk@z> --IZvIMz9tl2L1nu06CN8N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Daniel, I just pushed a V2 of my patch here: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/opene= mbedded-core/message/229434. I added variables to add a deterministic entry if wanted, an offline mode b= ased on DL_DIR, and a second .bbclass for SPDX2.2. I can't put SPDX 2.2 and SPDX3.0 in the same class as the task scheduling i= s very different and a single task won't be able to handle both. I want to add a third class for debug-source scenario but it is going to ta= ke me some time. Do you see any other issue to solve for the current two bbclass? --IZvIMz9tl2L1nu06CN8N Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Daniel, 
 
I just pushed a V2 of my patch here: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/= openembedded-core/message/229434.
I added variables to add a deterministic entry if wanted, an offline m= ode based on DL_DIR, and a second .bbclass for SPDX2.2.
 
I can't put SPDX 2.2 and SPDX3.0 in the same class as the task schedul= ing is very different and a single task won't be able to handle both. =
I want to add a third class for debug-source scenario but it is going = to take me some time. 
 
Do you see any other issue to solve for the current two bbclass?
--IZvIMz9tl2L1nu06CN8N--