From: Zhang Peng <peng.zhang1.cn@windriver.com>
To: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core][master][PATCH v2] groff: upgrade 1.23.0 -> 1.24.0
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 21:57:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6745abda-97f9-4963-b671-6c2722bbae0b@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DGZQ4TTU05M0.3UH0ADSIVMSTT@bootlin.com>
On 3/11/26 14:03, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
> On Mon Mar 9, 2026 at 4:08 PM CET, Peng (Paul) (CN) via lists.openembedded.org Zhang wrote:
>> From: Zhang Peng <peng.zhang1.cn@windriver.com>
>>
>> Upgrade to latest revision of 1.24.0.
>> - Drop patches included in this release.
>> - Add patch to fix test-groff not found in cross-compilation.
>> - Add patch to use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH in gropdf for reproducible PDF generation.
>> - COPYING, LICENSES: Refresh GPLv3 text.
>>
>> Release Note:[https://lists.gnu.org/r/groff/2026-02/msg00149.html]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Peng <peng.zhang1.cn@windriver.com>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the new version. It looks a bit better, reproducibility test
> passed at least once, but we still have failures in some builds. It
> seems to be a similar one:
>
> AssertionError: The following deb packages are different and not in exclusion list:
> /srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/reproducible/build/build-st/reproducibleB-extended/tmp/deploy/deb/./x86-64-v3/groff-doc_1.24.0-r0_amd64.deb
> The following rpm packages are different and not in exclusion list:
> /srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/reproducible/build/build-st/reproducibleB-extended/tmp/deploy/rpm/./x86_64_v3/groff-doc-1.24.0-r0.x86_64_v3.rpm
>
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/37/builds/3554
>
> Diffoscope output:
> https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20260310-jxtz43x1/packages/diff-html/
HI, Mathieu
It's very strange - I cannot reproduce this issue on my local Ubuntu
22.04 system. From the Yocto autobuilder system logs, I can't find any
useful hints to analyze the failure.
My suspicion is related to the host environment. The autobuilder uses
Fedora 40 while I'm testing on Ubuntu, but I don't think this difference
should cause the failure.
Any help or insights on this would be greatly appreciated.
Logs from my site:
2026-03-11 20:48:01,918 - oe-selftest - INFO - Adding: "include
selftest.inc" in
/buildarea2/project/poky-latest/groff-repo/bitbake-builds/poky-master/build-st/conf/local.conf
2026-03-11 20:48:01,918 - oe-selftest - INFO - Adding: "include
bblayers.inc" in bblayers.conf
2026-03-11 20:48:01,918 - oe-selftest - INFO - test_reproducible_builds
(reproducible.ReproducibleTests)
2026-03-11 21:03:11,734 - oe-selftest - INFO - Building reproducibleA
(sstate allowed)...
2026-03-11 21:17:05,330 - oe-selftest - INFO - Building prebuild for
reproducibleB-extended (sstate allowed)...
2026-03-11 21:29:33,140 - oe-selftest - INFO - Building
reproducibleB-extended (sstate NOT allowed)...
2026-03-11 21:33:26,758 - oe-selftest - INFO - Checking deb packages for
differences...
2026-03-11 21:33:26,897 - oe-selftest - INFO - Reproducibility summary
for deb: same=866 different=0 different_excluded=0 missing=153 total=1019
unused_exclusions=[]
2026-03-11 21:33:26,898 - oe-selftest - INFO - Checking ipk packages for
differences...
2026-03-11 21:33:27,024 - oe-selftest - INFO - Reproducibility summary
for ipk: same=866 different=0 different_excluded=0 missing=153 total=1019
unused_exclusions=[]
2026-03-11 21:33:27,025 - oe-selftest - INFO - Checking rpm packages for
differences...
2026-03-11 21:33:27,158 - oe-selftest - INFO - Reproducibility summary
for rpm: same=866 different=0 different_excluded=0 missing=153 total=1019
unused_exclusions=[]
2026-03-11 21:33:27,159 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... ok
2026-03-11 21:34:10,657 - oe-selftest - INFO -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2026-03-11 21:34:10,657 - oe-selftest - INFO - Ran 1 test in 2768.831s
2026-03-11 21:34:10,657 - oe-selftest - INFO - OK
2026-03-11 21:34:15,023 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS:
2026-03-11 21:34:15,023 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS -
reproducible.ReproducibleTests.test_reproducible_builds: PASSED (2725.24s)
2026-03-11 21:34:15,025 - oe-selftest - INFO - SUMMARY:
2026-03-11 21:34:15,025 - oe-selftest - INFO - oe-selftest () - Ran 1
test in 2768.831s
2026-03-11 21:34:15,025 - oe-selftest - INFO - oe-selftest - OK - All
required tests passed (successes=1, skipped=0, failures=0, errors=0)
> rg -C2 groff ./tmp/log/oeqa/testresults.json
205- ],
206- "same": [
207: "x86-64-v3/groff-dbg_1.24.0-r0_amd64.deb",
208: "x86-64-v3/groff-dev_1.24.0-r0_amd64.deb",
209: "x86-64-v3/groff-doc_1.24.0-r0_amd64.deb",
210: "x86-64-v3/groff-src_1.24.0-r0_amd64.deb",
211: "x86-64-v3/groff_1.24.0-r0_amd64.deb",
212- "x86-64-v3/perl-dbg_5.42.0-r0_amd64.deb",
213- "x86-64-v3/perl-dev_5.42.0-r0_amd64.deb",
--
1232- ],
1233- "same": [
1234: "x86-64-v3/groff-dbg_1.24.0-r0_x86-64-v3.ipk",
1235: "x86-64-v3/groff-dev_1.24.0-r0_x86-64-v3.ipk",
1236: "x86-64-v3/groff-doc_1.24.0-r0_x86-64-v3.ipk",
1237: "x86-64-v3/groff-src_1.24.0-r0_x86-64-v3.ipk",
1238: "x86-64-v3/groff_1.24.0-r0_x86-64-v3.ipk",
1239- "x86-64-v3/perl-dbg_5.42.0-r0_x86-64-v3.ipk",
1240- "x86-64-v3/perl-dev_5.42.0-r0_x86-64-v3.ipk",
--
2259- ],
2260- "same": [
2261: "x86_64_v3/groff-1.24.0-r0.x86_64_v3.rpm",
2262: "x86_64_v3/groff-dbg-1.24.0-r0.x86_64_v3.rpm",
2263: "x86_64_v3/groff-dev-1.24.0-r0.x86_64_v3.rpm",
2264: "x86_64_v3/groff-doc-1.24.0-r0.x86_64_v3.rpm",
2265: "x86_64_v3/groff-src-1.24.0-r0.x86_64_v3.rpm",
2266- "x86_64_v3/perl-5.42.0-r0.x86_64_v3.rpm",
2267- "x86_64_v3/perl-dbg-5.42.0-r0.x86_64_v3.rpm",
//Peng
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
> --
> Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 15:08 [OE-core][master][PATCH v2] groff: upgrade 1.23.0 -> 1.24.0 peng.zhang1.cn
2026-03-11 6:03 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2026-03-11 13:57 ` Zhang Peng [this message]
2026-03-11 15:02 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2026-04-03 11:08 ` Peng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6745abda-97f9-4963-b671-6c2722bbae0b@windriver.com \
--to=peng.zhang1.cn@windriver.com \
--cc=mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox