From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com (mail-wm1-f67.google.com [209.85.128.67]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05076C0ED for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id a5so7998575wmb.0 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 02:40:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uNhG6+lN++FB1bzY1j3RKVnSLGUiEiAF1MJkOfnJNb0=; b=Btb6odzEgGYJiXWoRdi1OV9A02y0atvUEuRzVOmB8v1S6RtU4R5sJGwAGmFP1riWWG PxK6oRP1JxSV/CnEk/FfZ4ii11YkLN4s7pE5s+aMHzPPShcCQ3m4sL7wK2ChVojVXOe8 uV7ldhgYNJ6ZXn6epv9H9HDVOOpxJZr31RH0M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uNhG6+lN++FB1bzY1j3RKVnSLGUiEiAF1MJkOfnJNb0=; b=ibYURaFuA39rrvAP5Vt3vw7i3olNfnreOFElef5AZ5u1rnFuK5xhEr3M3BdNegGjDj Q6CD4ct1m1X7kHuPjVJDiEF7yl3YqwP3Enst7cYYkDUYl/4sPjtiqDkOuuIe15xTvo5o SmhDZMemySSFuHUgbBqUyRibJvIP6yGbPkpOmQfN2tvhAo/dt6OQITJIv9NQ7CgG8v2z Aj72hLWPkXdXhB1wvVT2eDMZ9GpdLClmwWO0XaW2axz3xk5ZMMVcKH7npxlZYht6vMQy wKExlzZSQfAc9nLIYXXZgmh7Vaf07xU+ML19U2Z7hBLxesh0SuqHqq2nHWJgrjIGbHxv P0Zg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWnAa1EwSCasamBTIxNu37jaLAxBL2MF/W42hK4jlKe7wu6Y64j PpcEE0X25cs0fv88FyvFt3hO/g+c8Uw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyx9P9vVTy5nBOyJnjeJ4wnS58nr0a4jW3x8LzUQ0u9T+Q/i1wIRMhdVkZjPKG1eyS4kS6sMw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c847:: with SMTP id c7mr18918070wml.3.1578048025465; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 02:40:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from hex (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com. [87.81.244.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b10sm61823905wrt.90.2020.01.03.02.40.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Jan 2020 02:40:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <67936cf2c289480b0a9b94b7ca52ba2e061c0fad.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Stefano Babic , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 10:40:23 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20200103101536.2561-1-sbabic@denx.de> References: <20200103101536.2561-1-sbabic@denx.de> User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.1-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] u-boot-fw-utils: Add support for libubootenv X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 10:40:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 11:15 +0100, Stefano Babic wrote: > libubootenv is a replacement for u-boot-fw-utils. It is > hardware-independent and provides fw_printenv and fw_setenv tools > that > are full compatible with the ones provided by U-Boot. A library is > provided to access the environment from an own application. > License is LGPL-2.1 and this allow to link the library to proprietary > code. The user of the tools should install the configuration file > "fw_env.config", as he is already used to with u-boot-fw-utils. The > configuration file is compatible with u-boot-fw-utils. > > +PROVIDES += "u-boot-fw-utils" > +RPROVIDES_${PN} += "u-boot-fw-utils" What is the ultimate intention/end goal here? Does this replace u-boot- fw-utils? Should we remove the other recipe? Cheers, Richard