From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] task-core-tools: Divide it into 3 recipes
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:20:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6813503.3IHFcKk1Mm@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKF1spYemYppOw6u1AOUZa5jceFygYPnoEUFo6fM=UZmhZs9Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 24 January 2012 17:26:42 Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On 01/24/2012 09:42 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> task-core-tools-debug, task-core-tools-profile, task-core-tools-testapps
> >> otherwise if we choose one through PACKAGE_GROUPS all packages
> >> are built since they are in same recipe.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj<raj.khem@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc | 26 +++++--
> >> meta/conf/multilib.conf | 4 +-
> >> meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-tools-debug.bb | 26 ++++++
> >> ...sk-core-tools.bb => task-core-tools-profile.bb} | 81
> >> ++++++--------------
> >> .../recipes-core/tasks/task-core-tools-testapps.bb | 46 +++++++++++
> >> 5 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-tools-debug.bb
> >> rename meta/recipes-core/tasks/{task-core-tools.bb =>
> >> task-core-tools-profile.bb} (48%)
> >
> > This breaks meta-yocto which has a task-core-tools.bbappend
>
> that bbappend is redundant. You should just delete it anyway from meta-yocto
Amusingly I was thinking "who the heck put that in there?" and, wouldn't you
know it, it turned out to be me... I think at the time I was concerned only
with moving pieces out of OE-Core that were hardware-specific without making
any judgements about whether they were worthwhile or not.
I'd have to defer to someone who knows more about these tools, but if the
concern is that systemtap and lttng-ust might not be suitable for all
machines, we could simply use RRECOMMENDS in OE-Core and then set
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE for them in BSPs.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-25 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-24 17:42 [PATCH 0/7] uclibc update and misc fixes Khem Raj
2012-01-24 17:42 ` [PATCH 1/7] ltp: Update recipe and fix building on uclibc Khem Raj
2012-01-24 17:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] gdb-common: Drop elfutils from DEPENDS Khem Raj
2012-01-25 12:32 ` Richard Purdie
2012-01-25 14:58 ` Khem Raj
2012-01-24 17:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] task-core-tools: Divide it into 3 recipes Khem Raj
2012-01-25 1:08 ` Saul Wold
2012-01-25 1:26 ` Khem Raj
2012-01-25 10:20 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2012-01-24 17:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] uclibc: Dont package all .a in uclibc-dev Khem Raj
2012-01-24 17:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] eglibc-2.15: Add upstream status for x86_fenv.patch Khem Raj
2012-01-24 17:43 ` [PATCH 6/7] uclibc-git: Update to latest RC Khem Raj
2012-01-24 17:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] util-linux: Change SRC_URI to a fetchable location Khem Raj
2012-01-25 14:36 ` [PATCH 0/7] uclibc update and misc fixes Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6813503.3IHFcKk1Mm@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox