From: Quan Sun <Quan.Sun@windriver.com>
To: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH] qemu: upgrade 10.2.0 -> 11.0.0
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 11:52:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71990304-87b3-4b91-9d58-dfd0b756a0ca@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANNYZj8gMc8PdWMse=g1J7goZC5Ga=nwN5hA+uX02-G+LNHEwQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/29/26 11:23 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
> On Fri, 29 May 2026 at 16:45, Quan Sun via lists.openembedded.org
> <Quan.Sun=windriver.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>>> glx: failed to create dri3 screen
>>> failed to load driver: vgem
>>>
>>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/35/builds/3924
>>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/48/builds/3786
>>>
>>> Can you have a look at the issue?
>> It seems this issue is not caused by the qemu upgrade. I also asked an
>> AI agent to carefully examine the build/test logs, and the following is
>> what it says:
> Unfortunately AI has produced a total hallucination in its analysis,
> because it looks only at the build log given to it, not at the actual
> change that is being tested (e.g. it wouldn't see in that log that
> there is a qemu update, and it wouldn't go and analyse the qemu own
> changelog and commit history, and it wouldn't run the same test
> against qemu 10.x to narrow it down and so on).
>
> I went and tried this test with qemu 10.x on the same host, and it
> passes just fine:
>
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/35/builds/3928
>
> Then I cherry picked the qemu 11.x patch, and the test then fails:
>
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/35/builds/3930
>
> It's still possible something is misconfigured on the host (it runs
> tiger vnc standalone server to allow X clients such as qemu to render
> into it), but the issue is clearly triggered by the version upgrade.
>
> Alex
Hi Alex,
I looked at your test logs and not sure if you performed the test by
really using the qemu 11.0.0. (Note the QEMU binary used in the test was
built from sstate cache (1851 of
1852 tasks were cached —
Sstate summary: Wanted 187 Local 187 ... 100% match, 100% complete),
meaning it may have used
whatever QEMU version is already in master's sstate, not a freshly-built
QEMU 11.0 ?)
Regardless of the AI agent, but the earlier test really failed on the
worker ubuntu2510-vk-1 because that host lacks GPU/DRI3 drivers. Have
you performed your test on this worker ubuntu2510-vk-1 ?
Thanks,
Quan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-29 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 20:26 [OE-core][PATCH] qemu: upgrade 10.2.0 -> 11.0.0 Quan.Sun
2026-05-29 12:42 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2026-05-29 14:44 ` Quan Sun
2026-05-29 15:23 ` Alexander Kanavin
2026-05-29 15:49 ` Richard Purdie
2026-05-29 16:10 ` Quan Sun
2026-05-29 16:29 ` Alexander Kanavin
2026-05-29 16:47 ` Quan Sun
2026-05-29 17:18 ` Alexander Kanavin
2026-05-29 18:13 ` Quan Sun
2026-05-29 18:43 ` Alexander Kanavin
2026-06-05 6:35 ` ui: Regression calling eglInitialize() since v11.0.0 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-06-05 8:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2026-06-05 12:52 ` Alexander Kanavin
[not found] ` <dd1729c6-f6e8-4790-b166-a635e34b3b1c@rsg.ci.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
2026-06-05 15:17 ` Alexander Kanavin
2026-06-05 20:02 ` Alexander Kanavin
[not found] ` <18B647EA2CFF57AA.61226@lists.openembedded.org>
2026-06-10 10:36 ` [OE-core] " Alexander Kanavin
2026-06-05 15:21 ` Quan Sun
2026-06-05 19:55 ` [OE-core] " Alexander Kanavin
2026-06-05 22:18 ` Quan Sun
2026-05-29 15:52 ` Quan Sun [this message]
2026-05-29 16:17 ` [OE-core][PATCH] qemu: upgrade 10.2.0 -> 11.0.0 Alexander Kanavin
2026-06-02 16:57 ` Ross Burton
2026-06-02 19:25 ` Quan Sun
2026-06-02 19:44 ` Alexander Kanavin
[not found] ` <18B55B33A6799835.3712505@lists.openembedded.org>
2026-06-04 11:09 ` Alexander Kanavin
2026-06-04 15:58 ` Richard Purdie
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-05-26 19:19 Quan.Sun
2026-05-27 16:03 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-05-28 6:41 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2026-05-25 20:10 Quan.Sun
2026-05-26 9:39 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2026-05-26 14:42 ` Quan Sun
2026-05-18 18:01 Quan.Sun
2026-05-20 13:14 ` Antonin Godard
2026-05-20 19:56 ` Quan Sun
2026-05-15 15:48 Quan.Sun
2026-05-15 16:24 ` Alexander Kanavin
2026-05-15 19:15 ` Quan Sun
2026-05-06 21:48 Quan.Sun
2026-05-07 10:34 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2026-05-07 20:49 ` Quan Sun
2026-05-07 11:23 ` Alexander Kanavin
2026-05-07 15:01 ` Paul Barker
2026-05-07 20:29 ` Quan Sun
2026-05-08 20:08 ` Alexander Kanavin
2026-05-08 21:35 ` Quan Sun
2026-05-05 0:16 Quan.Sun
2026-05-05 7:43 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71990304-87b3-4b91-9d58-dfd0b756a0ca@windriver.com \
--to=quan.sun@windriver.com \
--cc=alex.kanavin@gmail.com \
--cc=mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox