From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f194.google.com (mail-pf0-f194.google.com [209.85.192.194]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51BE77616 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f194.google.com with SMTP id c4so12695083pfb.3 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:46:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=s2tCauuHI7UQpYTmDRndv5KSlVtC9H1A5cYcDDB7HYI=; b=eYCrobB/Kjf0UKWtZGU0lfj0z8Q0bo5sV4gFImPDUDL9ItcYRstzUwOF9W36i2VhiY gguinlPRuzM6usx+lKYPXJ5DAh+UOTS89aMUE54MOlOXjbhVWiuHdFE4cp3jBDbim+Eq HQazpvHrzvqfMdXksiW3cUl6iPYpgUPfds2qgOvYS3iBgkiY8dK5ENMxd4hL+vl9Y/Ly 4erurydaDAvSqlWNjGvcqc0qxTWhqUobseu/Qu/oHzEiRzr9Y72EHYPcGevQ4LPv6H1M fKUmLozV8xKf5xGzEFGcVwvYnia2RkO6vg3EMB8k4jxi925BK+ol9y2WZ474x3kSuG63 xDxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=s2tCauuHI7UQpYTmDRndv5KSlVtC9H1A5cYcDDB7HYI=; b=q4OHXnStuQPPhNXl8VdMshjtQgcb4PstaianwUUO8ERabuV36qLP48NtLytKe+nVe5 5bUdSE/IokUMU3Fs8ga1Y2VbrGymHVtlHCs6zRQkbDvzOjfakMa8DJIEcHu9WqmGQvkR yzH1hyniITHsxTx+c+tS7gf1dhXTzufEY1C/j2ok+lKxvaVRAg3UnhdQM3Sohju4hOom b8eVh8JdCMzHer0HVu3Iv7GSwlzFODufs+WxIPcGjPZMgs96EKl5LBVNwWgvtdhJZQd5 srkPoxq3jG8hWVZKeT5lUbAS7I0VVplraS7i7zNEfvbaZ6nQq8yicUoNZg7+mkjox3HG VuXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI0cmDG9eR42qZoV81Go15ZTPDys4u6BzNII8rOqQ/he8MzkcTD3CleWRLzIiIwsA== X-Received: by 10.84.196.164 with SMTP id l33mr21094566pld.150.1482425194772; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:46:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:8882:b8c:dc6c:df58:7743:431c? ([2601:646:8882:b8c:dc6c:df58:7743:431c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n8sm35203994pgc.0.2016.12.22.08.46.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:46:34 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) From: Khem Raj In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:46:34 -0800 Message-Id: <76D2662B-A921-47C5-802F-01CCDD2DD2A5@gmail.com> References: <20161222081414.29642-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> To: Nicolas Dechesne X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad: Backport patches for improving live playback X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:46:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On Dec 22, 2016, at 2:25 AM, Nicolas Dechesne = wrote: >=20 > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj >> --- >> ...1-mssdemux-improved-live-playback-support.patch | 929 = +++++++++++++++++++++ >> ...ming-implement-adaptivedemux-s-get_live_s.patch | 183 ++++ >> ...ming-use-the-duration-from-the-list-of-fr.patch | 62 ++ >> .../gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad_1.10.2.bb | 3 + >> 4 files changed, 1177 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 = meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad/0001-mssdemux-i= mproved-live-playback-support.patch >> create mode 100644 = meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad/0001-smoothstre= aming-implement-adaptivedemux-s-get_live_s.patch >> create mode 100644 = meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad/0001-smoothstre= aming-use-the-duration-from-the-list-of-fr.patch >>=20 >=20 > Do we really want to do that? Backporting in stable branch looks right > to me, but backporting to master while we know that we will get gst > 1.12 on time for the next release anyways, doesn't sound great to me. > maybe we should get these patches merged in 1.10.x instead of carrying > them ourselves? Thats a good idea, if we have 1.12 coming in time for 2.3 release then I = would not worry about it so much. however back-porting is certainly a good option but it should be carried = out independently of OE work.