From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.89] helo=fmsmga101.fm.intel.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TtDEq-0005Dt-T1 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:11:53 +0100 Received: from mail-fa0-f71.google.com ([209.85.161.71]) by mga01.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 09 Jan 2013 23:56:34 -0800 Received: by mail-fa0-f71.google.com with SMTP id m1so242965fam.2 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:56:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-received:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-gm-message-state; bh=LdDnMOzYBHVydfAKY1zRUw7AO2q6yyxJ+Fman8HEtPE=; b=NX1IVSnzv1ieDudNAeM+8XPRacsF3lCdfYV4vTbYWofi7lumglW3xrracP9lu9F5LF xtL/RLF5y5oeVDNw6S2mWul9xIGlQ7iAbsBOU16TrqglSk17bkOuzsQGHQYf/QXOV6xa ZFUqVu2DxhRPJNiKMAxXlj8pbIFtgcbtRMlZFYe0mM8uWcXzLAnygLr/41XWelHCjRjr Do2Q2Fjv6ie7Mw7Hn3XKpR7xSsRiae4gKMvaZdaEW35T83DQX6DyQrp+KLYZ9BGr2lqS fl2nrnH8e18SGmlG1zvOkXoOYeYWWE19V3C/n7OWrdVATZhCX5kiAroA7PM7Lkefj1cA kdCA== X-Received: by 10.194.19.170 with SMTP id g10mr113017374wje.56.1357804592389; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:56:32 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.19.170 with SMTP id g10mr113017369wje.56.1357804592276; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:56:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (35.106.2.81.in-addr.arpa. [81.2.106.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l5sm1056629wia.10.2013.01.09.23.56.30 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:56:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 07:56:30 +0000 From: Ross Burton To: =?utf-8?Q?Iorga=2C_Cristian?= Message-ID: <7782F5CBD39246A3A6204E6FE729FD71@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <969F26A8BAB325438E7EB80D3C3134FB161DC46C@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1357751495-28236-1-git-send-email-cristian.iorga@intel.com> <969F26A8BAB325438E7EB80D3C3134FB161DC46C@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnII7auCZ9DfSmk2BGBazrcWoevUc/KDZnjIqxpXNRZuxJgtEAJPUDRrK2ifCBPTVJ9QpB0xWlYd3p/34Aut8Uhmv/IXpcvAC/TUUCd2bxpAm4TMc1FNano8zDaFnOiKJQBB2sCOAtcADG/gPpZn57cbp7bihH1M6tQPxExIZ1l4XMEew+2A1mAv4LiChpja2jfRJvL Cc: "=?utf-8?Q?openembedded-core=40lists.openembedded.org?=" Subject: Re: [PATCH] connman: upgrade to 1.10 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:11:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 07:15, Iorga, Cristian wrote: > Well, I have the prior art stand by me. > The same technique is applied for netbase. > > And, in this specific case, connman should be machine specific. > Can you please give me more detail? > > The configuration file will have only the interface blacklist enabled in case of a qemu* machine. netbase is a lot smaller than connman. With this change you're rebuilding connman per-machine instead of sharing the package between compatible machines, with the only difference being a configuration file. Ross