From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] devtool: warn user about multiple layer having the same base name
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:25:40 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7850229.D4MhMV1OIs@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6c08eda49cd84388b7547243ee0e3d73a488b53.1561605262.git.Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
On Thursday, 27 June 2019 3:14:55 PM NZST Chen Qi wrote:
> Currently `devtool finish RECIPE meta' will silently succeed even
> if there are multiple layers having the same base name of 'meta'.
> e.g. meta layer from oe-core and meta layer from meta-secure-core.
Good catch!
> We should at least give user a warning in such case. With the patch,
> we will get warning like below.
>
> WARNING: Multiple layers have the same base name 'meta', use the first one '<PROJ_DIR>/oe-core/meta'.
> WARNING: Consider using path instead of base name to specify layer:
> <PROJ_DIR>/oe-core/meta
> <PROJ_DIR>/meta-secure-core/meta
>
"use the first one" -> "using the first one"
However I'm wondering if this is the right behaviour. What if the user realises they actually wanted the second one? Given it's a warning the finish operation would have proceeded and the user will have to clean things up manually. Rather than a warning, should we in fact be erroring out and requiring the user to be more specific in this case?
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-27 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-27 3:14 [PATCH 0/1] devtool: warn user about multiple layer having the same base name Chen Qi
2019-06-27 3:14 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chen Qi
2019-06-27 23:25 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2019-06-28 1:20 ` ChenQi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-28 10:09 Peter Kjellerstedt
2019-06-30 20:24 ` Paul Eggleton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7850229.D4MhMV1OIs@localhost.localdomain \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Qi.Chen@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox