From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T8XDB-0006T3-TD for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:01:10 +0200 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2012 06:48:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,359,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="140985628" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.155]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2012 06:48:47 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:47:56 +0100 Message-ID: <8068324.QSSVEOGDPm@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9 (Linux/3.2.0-29-generic-pae; KDE/4.9.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1345650627-3232-1-git-send-email-paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> <1345653628.3907.124.camel@ted> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Koen Kooi Subject: Re: [PATCH] zeroconf: remove - RFC X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:01:10 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 22 August 2012 17:44:14 Burton, Ross wrote: > > I'm not sure that is enough to warrant it staying in OE-Core. meta-oe > > might be a better fit? Can avahi be cut down for "tiny" usage though > > configuration? > > Agreed. > > I don't think Avahi can be cut down enough, zerconf only supports > exposing the machine name which is a pretty tiny subset of mDNS in > total. So, where does that leave us with this patch then? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre