----- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:

On 26 January 2016 at 23:14, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, we have narrowed down our problem to this specific patch by
> removing the patch from the OE gcc patches, rebuilding gcc, and
> then building our test program with that gcc. The problem goes
> away when we do so, which points directly to that patch as a
> culprit.
>
> Test program is attached.

Ok I think we can remove this from master and jethro release

Mathieu, as you found this do you want the glory by submitting a the removal patch?

Thanks for asking, but for me a

Reported-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>

in the patch commit messge is good enough.

You'll probably want to have a link to this discussion thread

also in the commit message.

Thanks,

Mathieu

Cheerss,

Ross

--

Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev