From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.efficios.com (mail.efficios.com [78.47.125.74]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B73976FFA for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B04F340529; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.efficios.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (evm-mail-1.efficios.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id D79BubFk-knt; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0DD340538; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:30:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at efficios.com Received: from mail.efficios.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (evm-mail-1.efficios.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id cKgecK-Ocg-0; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from evm-mail-1.efficios.com (evm-mail-1.efficios.com [78.47.125.74]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1F3340529; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:30:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Ross Burton Message-ID: <809092932.5736.1453901457659.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> In-Reply-To: <883932458.5623.1453895978760.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> References: <1037243108.4336.1453770172960.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <51287CFC-6F3C-43B1-9190-84F3B20C192E@gmail.com> <433937130.5072.1453838389504.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <883932458.5623.1453895978760.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [78.47.125.74] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.6.0_GA_1178 (ZimbraWebClient - FF43 (Linux)/8.6.0_GA_1178) Thread-Topic: Bogus openembedded gcc patch Thread-Index: CaEJUMCRK3cdkB5jLdTSqPyGskdd6hQytqrP Cc: lttng-dev , openembedded-core Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Bogus openembedded gcc patch X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:31:01 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5735_1906414831.1453901457658" ------=_Part_5735_1906414831.1453901457658 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:59 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: >> On 26 January 2016 at 23:14, Khem Raj < raj.khem@gmail.com > wrote: >>> > Yes, we have narrowed down our problem to this specific patch by >>> > removing the patch from the OE gcc patches, rebuilding gcc, and >>> > then building our test program with that gcc. The problem goes >>> > away when we do so, which points directly to that patch as a >>> > culprit. >>> > Test program is attached. >>> Ok I think we can remove this from master and jethro release >> Mathieu, as you found this do you want the glory by submitting a the removal >> patch? > Thanks for asking, but for me a > Reported-by: Mathieu Desnoyers > in the patch commit messge is good enough. > You'll probably want to have a link to this discussion thread > also in the commit message. I have a few minutes in front of me, I'll prepare a patch. Thanks, Mathieu > Thanks, > Mathieu >> Cheerss, >> Ross > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > EfficiOS Inc. > http://www.efficios.com > _______________________________________________ > lttng-dev mailing list > lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com ------=_Part_5735_1906414831.1453901457658 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
----- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:59 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoy= ers@efficios.com> wrote:
----- On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Burton, Ros= s <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:

On 26 January 2016 at 23:14, Kh= em Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> = Yes, we have narrowed down our problem to this specific patch by
> removing the patch from the OE gcc patches, rebuilding gcc, and
> then building our test program with that gcc. The problem goes
> away when we do so, which points directly to that patch as a
> culprit.
>
> Test program is attached.

Ok I think we can remove this = from master and jethro release


Mathieu,= as you found this do you want the glory by submitting a the removal patch?=

Thanks for asking, but for me a
=
Reported-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com&= gt;

in the patch commit messge is good enough.
<= div>You'll probably want to have a link to this discussion thread
=
also in the commit message.

I have a few minutes in front of me, I'll prepare a patch.

Thanks,

Mathieu<= br data-mce-bogus=3D"1">

=

Thanks,

Mathieu


Cheerss,
Ross


--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com<= /div>

_______________________________________________
lttng-dev= mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bi= n/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS In= c.
http://www.efficios.com
------=_Part_5735_1906414831.1453901457658--