From: "Richard Purdie" <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: swat <swat@lists.yoctoproject.org>,
"Mittal, Anuj" <anuj.mittal@intel.com>,
Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>,
Joshua Watt <jpewhacker@gmail.com>,
Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Subject: Autobuilder reproducibility target changes
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 12:19:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80c70797943e52fa430d2f9f65bffe7a90730dec.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
Regular users of the autobuilder will note that I've split the
reproducible builds test out of the main oe-selftest build and into its
own target build. This is because that test tends to run for a lot
longer time period and it helps to see the result separately.
I've only done this for master. If gatesgarth and dunfell want to
follow, that should be straight forward with a change to the branch in
autobuilder-helper. Obviously we should ensure this is working ok with
master first but so far so good.
It has already highlighted the difference between a successful run:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/115/builds/2
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/119/builds/2
(took 3-4 hours)
and failing two failing runs:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/116/builds/2
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/118/builds/2
(took 9 hours)
the time difference being the system trying to run diffoscope on vim-
common :/.
I'm aware I removed some recipes from the exclusions list after seeing
multiple passing builds for all distros and we're now seeing test
failures. My mistake was not waiting for the date to change and for
builds to run on an autobuilder worker with a different umask.
Meson is failing with a pyc file mismatch which diffoscope can't decode
and despite trying for 5 hours, diffoscope hasn't given any data on why
vim-common differs. I should have fixes in for quilt, valgrind, kernel-
devsrc and cwautomacros. The umask fix may fix other issues too. Alex
has improved the reporting so we can spot cases where exclusion is now
longer needed.
Cheers,
Richard
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-14 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-14 12:19 Richard Purdie [this message]
2021-02-14 15:04 ` Autobuilder reproducibility target changes Alexander Kanavin
2021-02-14 15:17 ` Richard Purdie
2021-02-14 16:30 ` Alexander Kanavin
2021-02-14 18:47 ` Joshua Watt
2021-02-14 19:17 ` Joshua Watt
2021-02-15 6:21 ` Alexander Kanavin
2021-02-15 16:23 ` Joshua Watt
2021-02-15 16:31 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80c70797943e52fa430d2f9f65bffe7a90730dec.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alex.kanavin@gmail.com \
--cc=anuj.mittal@intel.com \
--cc=jpewhacker@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=steve@sakoman.com \
--cc=swat@lists.yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox