From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7B278093 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:35:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jan 2018 03:35:33 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,344,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="9939042" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2018 03:35:32 -0800 To: Martin Kelly , Richard Purdie , "Burton, Ross" References: <20180104131238.21452-1-alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> <20180104131238.21452-2-alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> <0ff515da-6221-7074-11c9-96b1cb8380ba@linux.intel.com> <64c07649-f0df-9acc-fbf3-e8f6a52db9f1@xevo.com> <1515610131.29722.112.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <9a261bf7-62c9-2aa9-9fa2-d27bb6ff7653@xevo.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <83efbf54-dde5-2a84-00a0-6db5fc9e7ee5@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 13:35:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9a261bf7-62c9-2aa9-9fa2-d27bb6ff7653@xevo.com> Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] gnomebase-meson.bbclass: add a meson-specific version X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:35:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/10/2018 09:11 PM, Martin Kelly wrote: > Yes, to be clear, I'm not griping, as I'm very happy meson landed in > OE-core, and I'm working on SDK support now. I have an OE-core thread > going with meson upstream to get the issue fixed. > > To be clear though, I'm not sure it even regressed. AFAICT, it never > quite worked. > > Where would I add SDK tests for this? meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases is the place. Not sure what existing SDK tests are already there. Alex