From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33383CCD192 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 02:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [kirkstone 04/14] glibc: Remove partial BZ#25847 backport patches To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org From: "Dora, Sunil Kumar" X-Originating-Location: Bengaluru, Karnataka, IN (106.51.217.145) X-Originating-Platform: Windows Chrome 141 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 19:33:02 -0700 References: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <8400.1760495582957874981@lists.openembedded.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="HLExj8cfxctYW8ZcsFOS" List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 02:33:09 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/224872 --HLExj8cfxctYW8ZcsFOS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 04:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >=20 > are these backports being done in glibc 2.35 release as well ? Hi Khem, Yes, I=E2=80=99ve submitted the backported patches for this pthread issue t= o glibc upstream for the following stable branches: 2.38, 2.37, 2.36, and 2.35. You can find the submission here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-stable/2025-July/thread.html Carlos(Glibc maintainer) has already taken the patches into 2.38 and mentio= ned that he will review the others (including 2.35) as well. The long-term aim is to get these accepted= into glibc 2.35 upstream too, so that we can eventually drop our local backports in Yocto through regular branch = updates. Thanks, Sunil Dora --HLExj8cfxctYW8ZcsFOS Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 04:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
are these backports being done in glibc 2.35 release as well ?<= /blockquote>

Hi Khem,

Yes, I’ve submitted the backported patches for this pthread issue = to glibc upstream for the following stable
branches: 2.38, 2.37, 2.36= , and 2.35. You can find the submission here:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-stable/20= 25-July/thread.html

Carlos(Glibc maintainer) has already taken the patches into 2.38 and men= tioned that he will review the
others (including 2.35) as well. The l= ong-term aim is to get these accepted into glibc 2.35 upstream too, so that=
we can eventually drop our local backports in Yocto through regular = branch updates.


Thanks,
Sunil Dora

--HLExj8cfxctYW8ZcsFOS--