Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: Sona Sarmadi <sona.sarmadi@enea.com>
Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Made spdx support SPDX2.0 SPEC Signed-off-by: Lei	Maohui <leimaohui@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 09:28:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84598796-18B6-4415-8139-696137203834@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3230301C09DEF9499B442BBE162C5E48AC0FF12F@SESTOEX04.enea.se>


> On Dec 22, 2016, at 1:07 AM, Sona Sarmadi <sona.sarmadi@enea.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Lei, all,
> 
>> --- a/meta/classes/spdx.bbclass
>> +++ b/meta/classes/spdx.bbclass
>> @@ -1,12 +1,9 @@
>> # This class integrates real-time license scanning, generation of SPDX
>> standard  # output and verifiying license info during the building process.
>> -# It is a combination of efforts from the OE-Core, SPDX and Fossology
>> projects.
>> +# It is a combination of efforts from the OE-Core, SPDX and DoSOCSv2
>> projects.
> 
> Why replace Fossology with DoSOCSv2? Why not make it optional?
> 
> Has anyone any comments on this suggestion? AFAI see this patch has not been accepted yet. Is there any plan to do it?

I think DoSOCSv2 is more integratabtle into Yocto/OE infra and seems to be having, fossology setups are complex and is
slow too. so it might be a good option to have.

> 
> Cheers
> //Sona
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core



  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-22 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-27  0:11 [PATCH] To make yocto-spdx support spdx2.0 SPEC Lei Maohui
2016-06-27  0:11 ` [PATCH] Made spdx support SPDX2.0 SPEC Signed-off-by: Lei Maohui <leimaohui@cn.fujitsu.com> Lei Maohui
2016-12-22  9:07   ` Sona Sarmadi
2016-12-22 17:28     ` Khem Raj [this message]
2016-07-20  2:13 ` [PATCH] To make yocto-spdx support spdx2.0 SPEC Lei, Maohui
2016-08-16  4:56   ` Lei, Maohui
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-02-22  7:46 [PATCH] Made spdx support SPDX2.0 SPEC Signed-off-by: Lei Maohui <leimaohui@cn.fujitsu.com> Lei, Maohui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84598796-18B6-4415-8139-696137203834@gmail.com \
    --to=raj.khem@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=sona.sarmadi@enea.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox