From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com (mail-wm1-f44.google.com [209.85.128.44]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.8844.1616682434845061763 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:27:15 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=google header.b=KgBBpeom; spf=pass (domain: linuxfoundation.org, ip: 209.85.128.44, mailfrom: richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org) Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id g20so1287682wmk.3 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:27:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CKadSrp+vMRTHd+Ruuoe3uqRj95lKq1UTLHcq4k/Lys=; b=KgBBpeomvZdQn7rf6IlWftEXy/fbPMh9xYKHf5Z3bQEnGTMFSOjxpX+AQJGJ56+oJd ernq99wFDVC2RKaqCi7+EHcMwPvpICf2h/G9LiSTSSAIYn09BRdhneGfrsCQcXYsO+8I H8x6+ukpy1se4/v9tCt1SHmWgAM/0E/fUMB34= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CKadSrp+vMRTHd+Ruuoe3uqRj95lKq1UTLHcq4k/Lys=; b=WDrxbOKgDz9bnXOMVDdw+LObXGa6S+BWuovhiHQaM6zChXjBO/IXdN3T3PUaVD1IKs t5zsKcdtMFW6JIYjVzsx7xOYlFeb0+ZkRSwzWYifh2PN85vxc4D15xUNpqL/Qx9c6DZr NoHCaFxgaRlGaElGFuHkv5vMxdnJk55nD8f+/z9ELldi8wf8sONKkZOQT1Thr3VrRvLV XQDavvz9jTQzmsNE1eHQwc0w9JAUn5nZBrqhs0nlz4F6v1HlYHd1UpaPuiKHkMB1CcGw gp/mWKwhc14lW3ZDr2vSqooz9+RyECxfQznV+FYta3jF18DQrn/oDDQDqnkceRRUiIRb esiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Rg5tXR3NtzeoNM+b1fg5KJO6Igcld5qBiiuXQYvQ1fQlaKugb j6PJ6zyHK3q3K8SCee2jzM5qqw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrDQGknU/3NBeaKRjqB5kO9R2SDZjVhS7JiboVhxI5l+o+F9BzZzwonvcoRH/BFl4PX9YS4g== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cf18:: with SMTP id l24mr8107892wmg.182.1616682433344; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8b0:aba:5f3c:6a6e:24cd:b165:9075? ([2001:8b0:aba:5f3c:6a6e:24cd:b165:9075]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z8sm6065226wrh.37.2021.03.25.07.27.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <85dec47e7a6bf2533fe619fc391915d838e8924e.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v11] util-linux: split uuid in separate recipe to allow bootstrapping From: "Richard Purdie" To: Peter Kjellerstedt , "Oleksiy Obitotskyi -X (oobitots - GLOBALLOGIC INC at Cisco)" , Luca Bocassi , "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Cc: "bluelightning@bluelightning.org" , Khem Raj Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:27:12 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5f37ee174e3f45e094ee2bb71c3c0422@XBOX03.axis.com> References: <20201210184632.3448265-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> ,<20210311150959.782186-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <070d63d34bd6936df1e94c620103e2759dae0427.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <5f37ee174e3f45e094ee2bb71c3c0422@XBOX03.axis.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.39.2-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 14:22 +0000, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Richard Purdie > > Sent: den 25 mars 2021 10:34 > > To: Oleksiy Obitotskyi -X (oobitots - GLOBALLOGIC INC at Cisco) > > ; Luca Bocassi ; > > openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > > Cc: bluelightning@bluelightning.org; Peter Kjellerstedt > > ; Khem Raj > > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v11] util-linux: split uuid in separate > > recipe to allow bootstrapping > > > > On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 09:17 +0000, Oleksiy Obitotskyi -X (oobitots - > > GLOBALLOGIC INC at Cisco) wrote: > > > Could you look into this warning. > > > > > > WARNING: util-linux-2.36.2-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: util-linux-dev > > rdepends on util-linux-libuuid-dev, but it isn't a build dependency? > > [build-deps] > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/61/builds/3226 > > > > That failure was my fault when testing some fixes. > > > > I've sent out a patch which renames util-linux-uuid to util-linux-libuuid > > and sorts out the license issue Peter reported. > > I don't mind the recipe being renamed and cleaned up, but I would prefer > to see my entire patch for the license parts being either integrated before > this or squashed into it, whichever you prefer. It does not make sense to > use the same LIC_FILES_CHKSUM for util-linux-libuuid as for util-linux, > and setting the other LICENSE variables in util-linux.inc no longer makes > sense as they are only relevant for util-linux. I'm torn on that. Code with the other licenses is present, just not used in the final output and I personally suspect that having one LIC_FILES_CHKSUM  is going to be easier to maintain in the future rather than two separate ones. Cheers, Richard