From: Marc Ferland <ferlandm@sonatest.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lmsensors: Initial commit.
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:12:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871ugx9r9v.fsf@sonatest.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121017073136.GF3405@jama.jama.net> (Martin Jansa's message of "Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:31:36 +0200")
Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:29:21AM +0000, Patrick Turley wrote:
>> On Oct 16, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Wednesday 17 October 2012 00:37:39 Martin Jansa wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 05:47:26PM -0400, Marc Ferland wrote:
>> >>> Adds the lm_sensors applications. These consists of:
>> >> Is it really needed in oe-core? why not meta-oe?
>> >
>> > I'm thinking meta-oe is the place for this. As a bonus, rrdtool is already
>> > there.
>>
>> I am not qualified to have an opinion either way - but I *am*
>> curious about the motivating rationale. What are the reasons that
>> this should appear in meta-oe?
>
> oe-core as *core* for other layers, should have only the most important
> metadata which are needed for all other layers, like toolchain etc.
>
> A lot of embedded images does not include or need lmsensors, so it's
> kind of extra package which does not need to be included in *core*.
>
Thanks for the clarification Martin. But looking at
oe-core/meta/recipe-bsp I see things like acpid, libacpi, pcimciautils,
etc. I am wondering what makes lmsensors so much different than these
tools?
Regards,
Marc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-17 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 21:47 [PATCH] lmsensors: Initial commit (cover letter) Marc Ferland
2012-10-16 21:47 ` [PATCH] lmsensors: Initial commit Marc Ferland
2012-10-16 22:37 ` Martin Jansa
2012-10-16 23:28 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-10-17 0:29 ` Patrick Turley
2012-10-17 7:31 ` Martin Jansa
2012-10-17 13:12 ` Marc Ferland [this message]
2012-10-16 23:17 ` [PATCH] lmsensors: Initial commit (cover letter) Saul Wold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871ugx9r9v.fsf@sonatest.com \
--to=ferlandm@sonatest.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox