From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ni.com (skprod3.natinst.com [130.164.80.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4DD71A05 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 14:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-aus-mgwout1.amer.corp.natinst.com (nb-snip2-1338.natinst.com [130.164.19.135]) by us-aus-skprod3.natinst.com (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with ESMTP id u95EfMY0032754; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 09:41:22 -0500 Received: from adi-pc-linux ([130.164.14.198]) by us-aus-mgwout1.amer.corp.natinst.com (Lotus Domino Release 8.5.3FP6 HF1218) with ESMTP id 2016100509412212-608686 ; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 09:41:22 -0500 From: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu To: "Burton\, Ross" In-Reply-To: References: <20160908095633.26651-1-adrian.ratiu@ni.com> <878tv2znhb.fsf@ni.com> <871t0tzads.fsf@ni.com> <87bmyzdqfp.fsf@ni.com> <878tu3gg6m.fsf@adi-pc-linux.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 17:39:50 +0300 Message-ID: <8760p6hnbd.fsf@ni.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on US-AUS-MGWOut1/AUS/H/NIC(Release 8.5.3FP6 HF1218|December 12, 2014) at 10/05/2016 09:41:22 AM, Serialize by Router on US-AUS-MGWOut1/AUS/H/NIC(Release 8.5.3FP6 HF1218|December 12, 2014) at 10/05/2016 09:41:22 AM, Serialize complete at 10/05/2016 09:41:22 AM X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-10-05_05:, , signatures=0 Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] pango: add libpcre to DEPENDS X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:41:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, "Burton, Ross" wrote: > On 5 October 2016 at 12:59, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote: > >> I think libpcre_%.bbappend in meta-selinux is just missing the following >> line: >> >> ln -sf ${relpath}/${realsofile} ${D}${libdir}/libpcre.so.1 >> >> after creating this symlink the build works without problems (previously >> only libpcre.so symlink was created). >> >> Is this a proper solution? >> > > As meta-selinux is messing around with library locations, yes. This may be a stupid question (sorry) but here goes: Why can't ldconfig be made to search also in /lib, beside /usr/lib? That way it could find the moved libraries, right? > > Ross