From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [77.233.226.4] (helo=mail.doredevelopment.dk) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7Mya-0007w5-GM for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:16:28 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.doredevelopment.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334E364F0; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:08:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dev.doredevelopment.dk Received: from mail.doredevelopment.dk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (public.doredevelopment.dk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id imSjWXmEPrq2; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:08:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eha (unknown [192.168.18.101]) (Authenticated sender: eha) by mail.doredevelopment.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 505BE2CC8; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:08:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by eha (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ECD6CA51B0; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:08:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Esben Haabendal To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <1302001365.24596.459.camel@rex> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:08:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1302001365.24596.459.camel@rex> (Richard Purdie's message of "Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:02:45 +0100") Message-ID: <87y63n5028.fsf@eha.doredevelopment.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: poky Subject: Re: Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 07:16:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Richard Purdie writes: > One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan > of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at > least have some ideas how some of the issues can be handled. > .... > Does this make sense to everyone, are there any questions/ objections/ > concerns/ things I've missed? Which actual OE use-cases justify this kind of addition to OE? I know it is on the Yocto post 1.0 schedule, but is it actually a good thing for OE? Maintaining OE recipes is clearly not going to get any easier with multilibs support. /Esben