From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx36-out12.antispamcloud.com (mx36-out12.antispamcloud.com [209.126.121.60]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAC177F85 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 14:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [37.74.225.130] (helo=TOP-EX01.TOPIC.LOCAL) by mx19.antispamcloud.com with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e07Su-0002h5-Ti for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 16:49:36 +0200 Received: from [192.168.80.121] (192.168.80.121) by webmail.topic.nl (192.168.10.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:49:28 +0200 To: From: Mike Looijmans Organization: TOPIC Message-ID: <8b6c437e-c5b6-d242-5e1c-b19406153c76@topic.nl> Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:49:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [192.168.80.121] X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 9833cda7-5b21-4d34-9a38-8d025ddc3664 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-BIFURCATION-INSTANCE: 0 X-Originating-IP: 37.74.225.130 X-SpamExperts-Domain: topic.nl X-SpamExperts-Username: 37.74.225.128/28 Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=37.74.225.128/28@topic.nl X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.09) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5l7RZG3Uw5vSKTw/Zx1Mq9kXv9krsgRhBn0ayn6qsUc7bT9yB6+5kUQX UPqxCpKoZ5jW+r1f/TnG1eQk5gcAU2WhbUpxw1vG9PXf7FQITIU+5y52g9tkUN1gyfQJCkGsPFpr jQPFk8m4tSTfORUp3ym5u2cOM36kSfHLUNZ8jXlTlpkp8lcBwdj1nW72qmYnhk6MzMc1fDmFYhRo 7i9WJP5mbN3yE6VLW+O3vV6S7uAIDD99ZlIsNfiocclhkIZyCGjioP69xCSqetMX+Tub+tlh+q6J LTjskgR575u7xBF9hR7TYzdcZcyGV4sMr3jbmlhuJD+Y8aK1TyNciD6O03XTF30yCBdC0hoGIYfN AfQYf1exmkjWatqTdEex9V99jq6OzRuRTJwMfmIg2Nif3MxrBz0V0g4dFqQD34faMjgG1QvB/+yF uaiuWkOJt9O67X0L6e4zOli0rnG7yFLXzFow01W+NjrLbEwlXeN/SGGsLrdRfTGQ/ER6YFMqAKA1 uuidX4Ts4xdG+C13IyWeZaJlAy8FU/wcJ5JtAUu50klfjzMVFIf3P+0IJqUbiG872h7xteQEmGaV W1mnJSWy6AuNgs8oYZ5lsqYsWCts9e//Ca1bA7EWj1UdpyT2OFucbhHs8hFved+TJQDB7m48G5wy ib2YE5CQCxqaNpZCFyWPoUMKiAE1LoIP8/8PHVIU4dU7sbKGfaun//Cs8l49htwccBIk1Sag4dKi qCrF8eZZ1QHMcEeBpH8yvscxmKl4od5A5psCwEHlRDIvt/V1ctXmZ4ldddW8AQ13MCJzaGFMOmG6 /54gza7q5Za0AFsz6MnV7t/5I5IUYXUcyaqJvqWePPfahHwp+39ee3Z+Hn10kVWClPVvbW5lVyQa nRxw5oyYMyos1aE7d9BPogpXu4GPi179JfUwTJS+PZhsciKe X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine2.antispamcloud.com Subject: Recipe versions and layer confusion X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:49:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: nl Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BFI'm confused. Layer "meta-xilinx" defines: recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.1.bb This recipe is too old for my liking, so I made a newer one in "meta-topic" recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.3.bb Much to my surprise, when I build, OE picks the 2017.1 version and not the= =20 2017.3 version. bitbake-layers show-layers reveils: .. meta-xilinx /home/mike/projects/zynq-platform/meta-xilinx 5 meta-topic /home/mike/projects/zynq-platform/meta-topic 6 .. so that means that my meta-topic should win even if my PV were lower, right= ? Kind regards, Mike Looijmans System Expert TOPIC Products Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79 E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com Website: www.topicproducts.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Visit us at the Space Tech Expo Europe (Stand E-71)